>Nobody wants a nerd in congress. They want people who are ready to kick ass and take names.
>in the past Q did a lot of proofs to make sure anons see it as legit. deltas and knowledge of certain events and such, or the tippy top thing. new drops seem to not fit that well - kind of drops anyone could have written.
>if so, how can you be sure it´s actually legit use of it?
A reasonable question.
But Q's authenticity was never simply a matter of technogeak stuff.
In the past, much simpler pointers to Q's connection with Trump, slowly added over time, established that Q was coming from the Trump White House.
But maybe we are beyond that now, and more complex "proofs" of Q's legitimacy are what we get.
I believe that anons put together multiple such "proofs" upon tripcode Q's reappearance.
This one I have since I did it but I saw other anons put together different proofs… don't have my files organized so well…
I tossed the graphic together right when I "saw it" so I hope it makes sense…
https://twitter.com/laura_greenaura/status/1547921857432526848
Apparently the RUSSIANS stopped her from publishing her QANON expose…
DL it here:
https://t.co/cOWpvoSgeA
Strange that these people never bother to report that the central claim of the Q movement is that Q is an insider tied to Trump.
There exist innumerable "proofs" of this claim.
They never even attempt to refute these.