Anonymous ID: 8f940e Jan. 26, 2018, 11:29 a.m. No.168629   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>168443

''Too"" obvious.

Look at that tool Francis.

Do you really think anybody fears him?

Vatican may have money but it has no real army and is losing influence with Catholics.

So, it's losing whatever power it had.

Plus, there are a shitload of cardinals that handle daily Vatican/Pope shit. Every one of those cunts would have to be under the thumb to be kept silent about the fuckery.

P is someone more isolated and feared because the hellfire that he can buy.

Anonymous ID: 8f940e Jan. 26, 2018, 11:40 a.m. No.168703   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>168671

^^^This.

Dems have to trot out a Kennedy (Camelot bullshit reminder) because;

1) they have no leadership after Chucky Schumer caved and SF Non can string 3 words together coherently,

2) all efforts by the msm to carry a pro-dem/anti-Trump narrative are failing daily,

3) Trump is kicking absolute ass on the world stage and at home,

4) the dems are fucking desperate as they know that Thor's Hammer is about to drop on 2/3 of them.

Anonymous ID: 8f940e Jan. 26, 2018, 11:51 a.m. No.168799   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>168740

I haven't read that piece, so I don't know if anything new is in it.

But the fact that Jugears emailed Hillslag on her private server is very old news … one year old, at least.

Same tactic was used with the 0bama-Farrakhan picture: bring up old shit that doesn't mean anything in order to distract from the memo, Davos success, and the texts.

National Review is a likely compromised establishment "conservative" publication.

I used to get National Review on dead wood back when Bill Buckley ran it.

NR has taken a dramatic left turn since lil Richy Lowry started running it.

Bottom line: I am extremely suspicious of anything that comes from National Review.