Good day to anons reading this,

This thread is going to be an attempt to build the Qmap by building the bridges and making the connections between different issues & threads, as well as finding out the truth about the REAL history of mankind. It’s all about digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs, digs…

Link to:

Bridges & Maps 3: https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/6687429.html

Bridges & Maps 4: https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/9207873.html

Bridges & Maps 5: https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13198790.html

Bridges & Maps 6: https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/13718828.html

Bridges & Maps 7: https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/15012526.html

Bridges & Maps 8: https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/16650503.html

Archives of :

Bridges & Maps 1: http://archive.is/yzA4B

Bridges & Maps 2: https://archive.is/VbcWi

This is the old man,

After consideration, I decided to repost some of the pages from thread 8, starting with the giant subject, because they will be needed further down. It’s better to have them in front of us. So for old readers, thank you for sticking up with this old man. For new readers, I would be asking them to go back to thread 4 and start reading from the very first page or they will be unable to fully grasp what it’s all about since this is a long chain.

I’m going to keep on working as long as I can. After the lights go out, I don’t know what’s going to happen in general, and to this place as well. You have enough to continue without me if I’m unable to give you more information.

What is ahead is going to be harsh on everyone. I do mean everyone. Don’t take it lightly. Prepare as much as you can, physically and mentally. When you are shot, it hurts when the bullet gets inside of your body. When that bullet is being extracted in surgery, it will hurt as twice as much. Be brave, be kind, be patient, be caring. Pray. I’ve introduced you to a very incredible friend. Pray, ask for his help, his guidance and his blessings. What is coming ahead will not make sense even to veteran anons. When you feel that fear and that panic sink into you, ask for his help, comfort and guidance. The monk is listening. Be true, and he will be true to you in return.

Thank you and God bless you all.

(Please read from the start)

The articles I’m putting of giants found in Northern America are a sample, there are of course others online which the reader should check. But sorry, I’m unable to verify the authenticity of the excavations, finds, and mostly the pictures. The first article I’ve picked among others from the net is about giant skeletons found in Wisconsin because the chances are high these are somehow linked to the Mississippian culture and all of that we saw and talked about it back in those pages. So let’s check this article: https://www.cultofweird.com/death/giant-skeletons-in-wisconsin/

“Giant Skeletons of Mound Builders in Wisconsin

November 16, 2014/in From the Grave/by Charlie Hintz

In recent years, research by Jim Vieira and others into historical claims of giant human skeletons has reinvigorated the interest (and controversy) in a topic that is widely discounted as pseudoscience.

My interest in the subject began where it has for many – with the mention of giants in the ancient texts commonly referred to as the book of Genesis. It is easy to disregard these antediluvian tales of an extraordinary race of giants produced through the coupling of celestial beings with human females. When these stories were first told, humanity was still huddling in dark caves and making offerings to the various gods and spirits who governed their fates.”

>> I don’t support what is written in this paragraph. The Book of Genesis is a book written according to how (((they))) view history. There is no mention of the Cataclysm which was unleashed on the world and destroyed almost every living form because of the greed and twisted mind of an evil ruling couple. So you shouldn’t EVER forget that the Book of Genesis is manipulated, twisted and well styled version = not just any version of history; it’s about (((their))) version of history = how (((they))) see things.

“However, stories of giants are not exclusive to archaic origin stories fabricated by ancient cultures to make sense of a world without scientific understanding.”

>> The ancient cultures didn’t fabricate anything. They were closer to the truth than we are right now.

“It seems that around the turn of the century, human skeletons measuring unnatural heights were being unearthed all over America, often from the burial mounds of an unknown people we call Effigy Mound Builders.

If the media of the time is to be believed, Wisconsin has yielded several unique and significant clues to the giant skeleton mystery. This may be due to the numerous animal effigy mounds all across the state, as well as a large population of Middle Mississippian mound builders who flourished in the area for four hundred years before they vanished.”

>> The link between the giant skeletons and the Mississippian culture (along with the sites) is very obvious.

• Page 2 427 –

>>16827399

(Please read from the start)

“The remnants of a city built around a large central mound was discovered near Madison in 1835. The city, known as Aztalan, is believed to have flourished from 900-1300, possibly serving as a northern outpost for the much larger city of Cahokia in present-day Illinois.

Most of the Aztalan mounds were destroyed in the late 1800s, whatever relics to be found taken by treasure hunters. One disturbed mound was found to contain the remains of a young female now called the Princess of Aztalan. She was found to have a slight deformation in her spinal column, which may have caused her to be more highly regarded. She was wrapped in belts of seashells, some coming from as far away as the Gulf of Mexico.”

>> This is how far the trade with the Mississippian culture went.

“Though she was of average height, the princess is one of only a few burials discovered in the area, which include a headless male and five cremated remains. There are rumors of a giant skeleton unearthed in the area, but I haven’t found any reports to corroborate it.

Maple Creek Giant

A New York Times article published December 20, 1897 reported the discovery of a giant human skeleton in the largest of three recently discovered mounds in Maple Creek, WI. The article states the skeleton measure over nine feet from head to foot and the skull was “as large as a half bushel measure.” Tempered copper rods and other relics were found with the bones.

The two remaining mounds were going to be “excavated soon.” What was found in them, and where is the giant now?”

>> Good questions.

“18 Skeletons Found Near Lake Delavan

The May 4th, 1912 edition of the New York Times reported what might be one of the strangest giant skeleton discoveries of all. An excavation of one large mound on Lake Fawn Farm near Lake Delavan revealed the skeletal remains of eighteen individuals measuring between 7.6 and 10 feet. The “heretofore unknown race of men” were found to have six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot, as well as double rows of teeth in their large, elongated skulls.”

>> These are rather interesting details: So the height varied from 7.6 to 10 feet high. They had 6 fingers and 6 toes. They had elongated skulls. And each had a double row of teeth. Take note of these details, we are going to need them for later on.I wish there were at least some pictures around of what is said here about the skeletons, so we can have a visual.

• Page 2 428 –

>>16827417

(Please read from the start)

“From directly over the eye sockets,” the article states, “the head slopes straight back and the nasal bones protrude far above the cheek bones. The jaw bones are long and pointed, bearing a minute resemblance to the head of the monkey. The teeth in the front of the jaw are regular molars.”

It goes on to say that other remains, presumably of women, were found with smaller heads but similar characteristics. The remains were found embedded in charcoal and covered with layers of baked clay to shed water from the sepulchre.”

>> First thing to note is the “care” given to burry these remains properly and no damage from “nature” occurs to them. Secondly, if the skeletons found next to the biggest one are smaller in size and have smaller heads, it doesn’t necessarily mean they are those of women; unless a study was made on the pelvic bones and also some DNA tests were made….then if the results came out they are women, I will accept it. But assuming these skeletons are of women solely because of their “smaller” size compared to the big one, is not the correct way to proceed. It sounds like that big skeleton is totally different from the others.

“Lizard Mound Skeleton in West Bend

While researching his book Washington County Paranormal, author J. Nathan Couch uncovered an account of a giant skeleton discoverd right here in our backyard.

I was fascinated by Lizard Mound County Park, just outside of West Bend, WI, ever since my first visit when I was very young. At the time, an installation constructed by the Milwaukee Public Museum provided a window into one mound, showing the bones and artifacts as they were originally buried.

Though those bones were of normal size, larger bones were accidentally unearthed by farmers in another nearby mound. Read the account of that find: Giant Skeleton Unearthed by Wisconsin Farmers in 1912

Giant Indian Bones Found Near Fond Du Lac

This snippet of a newspaper so far is the only thing I have found on the topic of a giant skeleton being found near Fond du Lac, Wisconsin.”

>> Well, this article isn’t that great, but it does gives us a good idea of the location of many sites were several skeletons of giants were found buried in mounds there; as well as few interesting details about the skeletons.

• Page 2 429 –

>>16827424

(Please read from the start)

Finds made “accidently” are always the best in archaeology, and we have one in Wisconsin, mentioned in the previous articles about some farmers finding the skeleton of a giant in 1912. So let’s take a closer look to this: https://www.cultofweird.com/death/giant-skeleton-wisconsin-effigy-mound/

“Giant Skeleton Unearthed By Wisconsin Farmers in 1912

November 16, 2014/in From the Grave/by J Nathan Couch

The following is an excerpt from J. Nathan Couch’s book Washington County Paranormal, which details the local history and legends of West Bend, WI and surrounding areas. While researching Lizard Mound County Park, he uncovered a report of a giant human skeleton found in one of the burial mounds.

Lizard Mound County Park is a cluster of mounds, many of them burial mounds, located in Hagner’s Woods. They range in shape from simple linear and conical mounds to effigies of birds, panthers—now thought to be depictions of water spirits—and one particularly unique “lizard,” though experts now largely agree it’s actually a turtle.”

>> I’m not sure, but it’s possible the mounds were shaped after the Sebetti clan’s heraldic animals. Birds, felines and lizards are all Sebetti clans heraldic symbols.

“The people who built these mounds are as mysterious as the mounds themselves. Commonly referred to as the “Effigy Mound Builders,” they lived in Wisconsin and neighboring states between 700 CE and 1200 CE.”

>> I don’t think we should trust those dates. All the dates worldwide, provided by the Main Stream History, should be re-examined and re-evaluated.

“Today, the debate over the identity of these mound builders focuses on determining which of the modern-day Native American tribes’ ancestors constructed these beautiful earthen works. However, there was a time when some doubted that the mounds were built by Native Americans at all. Since the natives who lived in the area of the mounds were no longer building them when Europeans first arrived in Wisconsin, it was assumed that some lost culture, or “race,” had to have been responsible. Naturally, this “lost race” must have been eradicated by the current native population. I can’t help but notice this theory of an established culture being displaced by a newer, more aggressive culture mirrored exactly what was happening as Europeans conquered North America.”

>> Yes, an ancient culture did build these mounds, but it was NOT ERADICATED, but more likely the descendants forgot their ancestors and at some point in time, they might have been ruled over by the Evil Clan long, long after the initial survivors and their direct descendants passed away = thousands of years later. With each new generation, the ancient history, genealogy and knowledge was lost, forgotten or misunderstood. This is why I use the word mutation and not evolution when I talk about this matter. It didn’t evolve, it twisted and morphed from the original and took the form of whatever the younger generation thought it was, regardless if it was correct or wrong.

• Page 2 430 –

>>16827430

(Please read from the start)

“Posited identities of the “lost race” ranged from the slightly plausible Aztecs to the nearly impossible lost tribe of Israel or the Atlanteans. Early twentieth-century West Bend writer and Washington County historian Carl Quickert subscribed to the “lost race” theory.”

>> It turned out it’s the Atlantean survivors. Well, this is what we call nowadays the survivors of the ancient, lost civilization before the Cataclysm; but what do they call themselves? It would be really interesting to find out what they called themselves; what their real name is. When and if we find out what it is, then this is how we should call them = by their real name and not a name we invented and given to them.

“In the first volume of Washington County, Wisconsin Past and Present (1912), Quickert writes about the extraordinary discovery of enormous human bones near what is now Lizard Mound County Park. While collecting gravel for road construction, farmers uncovered a cache of bones that, when assembled, formed a skeleton eight feet in height. The skull’s lack of “protruding cheekbones” suggested that it belonged to “a different race of men” than the Native Americans.”

>> What does it mean that these skeletons belonged to a different race of man? Is it something like the Neanderthal?

“As is usually the way when the bones of a giant are discovered, when exposed to air, they quickly disintegrated. Only the skull, which Quickert reports had teeth measuring a full one-inch in length, remained intact. Quickert doesn’t reveal the fate of the giant’s skull, so keep your eyes open next rummage sale season.”

>> Oh my! Anyone reading wants to have a guess where the skull ended up? Whom bought this skull? It’s so obvious, isn’t it? Do you think (((they))) would miss the opportunity to get (((their))) nasty little hands on such a skull? (((They))) also have deep pockets and (((their))) are the kings of the black market.

“Since the skeleton was assembled by farmers instead of archeologists, it seems wrong to take their estimation of size as accurate. It also seems unlikely that the bones could survive being assembled by laymen but soon after be destroyed by contact with the air. It’s much more likely that this was a tall tale Quickert erroneously took as fact.”

>> First of all, the bones simply don’t disintegrate like magic as described. They are fragile, but can be handled with care if wanted. Secondly we can “estimate” and reconstruct the entire skeleton’s body based on the skull sometimes; of course depending on the case, but it’s very doable. My guess is at least a good section of this skeleton made it into (((their))) hands.

“Quickert supposes the skeleton may have belonged to a people who inhabited “New Iceland” according to the Icelandic sagas. Quickert puts forth the idea that a war erupted between these legendary “Germanic people” and a “Mongolian people”—the Native Americans—which ended in the total destruction of these ancient European giants.

Is this hard to believe? Yes, a bit.”

>> Well, that’s a wrong theory. These skeletons were most probably the remains of the survivors of the Cataclysm; which makes them what we call Atlanteans.

• Page 2 431 –

>>16827437

(Please read from the start)

So I decided to look around a bit more about giant skeletons, but in a different state. I found this article about giant skeletons in West Virginia: https://www.legendsofamerica.com/giants-west-virginia/

“In many of the ancient burial mounds of West Virginia, several “giants” were found in years past. Other large skeletons were found in the early days of coal mining, and more were found as people were excavating the ground for other purposes.

One of the first reports of a giant occurred in 1774 when Jack Parsons was walking along the recently flooded Cheat River. When he noticed some bones protruding from the ground, he pulled a femur from the soil, and when he compared it to his own, it was seven inches longer. He then removed the rest of the bones and laid them out, estimating that it would have stood about eight feet tall. Other settlers also found gigantic skeletons in the area, which was soon dubbed “Giant Town.”

In 1838, when amateurs excavated the Grave Creek Mound in present-day Moundsville, West Virginia., they were said to have found giant human skeletons inside that were as long as eight feet.

In the 1850s, a root cellar was being dug in Palatine (East Fairmont), West Virginia. Here, workers uncovered two very large human skeletons, said to have been more than seven feet tall. Several people saw the skeletons, but that night, the bones were stolen, assumed to be sold on in the lucrative market of “Indian relics,” which existed at the time.

In 1857, the Western Literary Messenger reported that the skeleton of a giant had been found, stating:

“A day or two since, some workman engaged in subsoiling the grounds of Sheriff Wickham, at his vineyard in East Wheeling, came across a human skeleton. Although much decayed, there was little difficulty in identifying it by placing the bones, which could not have had belonged to other than a human body, in their original position. The impression made from the skeleton itself was measured by the Sheriff and a brother in the craft locale, both of whom were prepared to swear that it was 10 feet, 9 inches in length. Its jaws and teeth were almost as large as those of a horse. The bones are to be seen at the Sheriff’s office.”

In 1875, when workers were constructing a bridge near Paw Paw Creek’s mouth at Rivesville, they uncovered three giant skeletons with strands of reddish hair clinging to their skulls. A local doctor was called to examine the remains, who determined that they were human and estimated that the skeletons were approximately eight feet tall. Afterward, with exposure to the air, the bones deteriorated rapidly.”

>> A HUGE notable is the strand of reddish hair.

“In 1882, amateur archaeologists F.M. Fetty and his wife were exploring an unusual rock formation along White Day Creek in Marion County when they found what appeared to be a shelter. On closer examination, they discovered that a false wall had been erected, and after removing several large stones, they found a huge ancient mummy sitting in a chair. The giant was surrounded by stone and flint artifacts.

In the summer of 1883, James A. Faulkner unearthed a gigantic human skeleton in the same area. Dr. Samuel Kramer of Smithtown was called in and measured this skeleton, which was found to be 7 feet 4 inches long, and deduced that it belonged to a person who was almost eight feet tall.

That same year, the Smithsonian Institution dispatched a team of archaeologists to the Criel Mound in South Charleston. Led by Colonel Lewis Morris, the team conducted extensive digs of some 50 mounds in the area and issued a detailed report.”

• Page 2 432 –

>>16827442

(Please read from the start)

“In their investigation, the team uncovered numerous giants, one of which was 7’6″ tall and decorated with six heavy copper bracelets on each wrist, and on his shoulder were three large plates of mica. In another mound, they found a circle of ten skeletons surrounding a giant skeleton, as well as underground vaults, various copper and mica ornaments, jewelry, religious items, pipes, and spearheads. Another giant skeleton was also found that had a “flat-head” type skull.

As more digs progressed in the coming years, archaeologists in Wheeling, West Virginia, found another grouping of giants ranging in height from 6’7″ to 7’6″, displaying unusual skull formations with low foreheads and prominent backs of the skull.

As similar discoveries were unearthed, the Charleston Daily Mail published an article in October 1922 that stated:

“One of the most interesting of the five state parks is Mound Park, at Moundsville from which that city derived its name. Probably no other relic of pre-historic origin has attracted a wide study among archaeologists as the Grave Creek Mound, which has given up skeletons of the ancients who constructed it… Some years ago, archaeologists investigating the mound dug out a skeleton said to be that of a female because of the formation of the bones. The skeleton was seven feet four inches tall, and the jawbone would easily fit over the face of a man weighing 160 pounds.”

In June 1930, the Clarksburg Sunday Exponent reported:

“Interesting and valuable evidence of a race of gigantic people who inhabited this section of West Virginia more than one thousand years ago have been exhumed from two newly explored mounds located near Morgansville, which is on the Northwestern turnpike about 12 miles west of Salem.

The particular tribe or race which inhabited this section of the state is believed to have been composed of individuals ranging from seven to nine feet in height, and it is thought they were Siouan Indians. The best-preserved skeleton found at Morgansville was in a clay encasement, and all of the vertebrae and other bones, excepting the skull, were saved without much crumbling. Careful measurement of the skeletons proved that the Indians were about seven feet, six inches tall.

This was in response to Professor Ernest Sutton, the head of the Geography Department at Salem College, having excavated two mounds in Doddridge County, in which he uncovered four skeletons.

The most recent discovery of these giants was made in 1959 when Dr. Donald Dragoo, the curator for the Section of Man at the Carnegie Museum, excavated the Cresap Mound in Marshall County. There, he unearthed a 7 feet 2-inch skeleton.”

>> The Smithsonian and now the Carnegie Museum = the Bloodlines are surely interested in those giants!

“Tales of colossal giants permeate American History, not only in West Virginia but across the continent. These many finds in America and the rest of the world support the idea that giants once walked on earth centuries ago and are more than just mythological beings.”

• Page 2 433 –

>>16827450

(Please read from the start)

>> I know there are a lot of researchers out there interested in this specific digging tunnel = the giants. When it comes to this specific article, it would have been good if we could get our hands on the initial raw data from the digging excavations along with the pictures, maps, notes etc. that goes with it. Things like the orientation of the burial, etc. would have provided us with clues as to the astrological knowledge of these buried giants and in the same time, it might have provided us some hints to their beliefs.

There is a remarkable number of them in Both Wisconsin and West Virginia. What I like about such articles is that they help/provide a good short list for greenhorns researching about giants in the Northern America. This could be a good starting point for new researchers and they can expand from there.

I would advise researcher to do here, about this digging subject, what I suggested to do about the megalithic Phoenician sites. Grab a map of the county first, start to put pins on it where mounds were excavated and skeletons of giants were found. When you do that, check out if there is some type of correlation with constellations or other astral matters. When you finish that, zoom out and put pins on the level of the state map; like in our case with this article, it’s in West Virginia. Again, once finished, try to see if there is some type of connections with astronomy.

Then you gotta zoom out once more and pin the sites of several states and see if there is something which links them together. In this specific case we can see on the map that I’ve attached with this page that the Ohio River is a branch of the Mississippi River; this is what connects all the Giant skeletons sites together = it’s the Mississippian culture and just look how it’s expanded along with the same locations as the Mississippi River. I’m saying it again = the Mississippi River (along with its branches) is what connects all the giant skeletons we’ve seen so far. If I follow the “river logic” then, it means that in every single state which this river flows in (including the branches) there is a big possibility to uncover new skeletons of giants.

It’s clear even to a blind man that the mounds, the copper work, the mysterious “lost” culture and the giant skeletons are all connected to the Mississippi River and they ALL belong to the same group. Usually, when this sort of work is done/finished on a local level, then you should regroup the data from all the States. This type of research shouldn’t stop on the borders/limits of each state we found skeletons of giants in. It should cross these borders because of the River. The true territory of study should be at the river territory level and not be stuck on each state territory level. When this stage is done, then we should pin on a map the sites on a national level, always checking for any astral correlation with each step we are progressing and finally check things out with Canada and Mexico. There are many stages to this mapping as anons can see. Some levels may bare fruits, while others won’t. It’s a long type of work and you gotta be meticulous and accurate to get good result. This type of mapping requires a lot of patience and is time consuming because you gotta verify every single data before pinning it on a map, to make sure it’s authentic.

I’m going to stop it here for this article.

• Page 2 434 –

>>16827455

(Please read from the start)

Let’s read more articles about the skeleton of giants in Northern America:

https://www.gaia.com/article/giant-skeletons-have-been-found-buried-in-mounds-across-america

“Giant Human Skeletons Found Buried in Mounds Across North America

December 7, 2020

Around the turn of the 19th century, there were hundreds of reports from reputable sources of giant skeletons unearthed from ancient burial mounds across America. Human giants are not entirely a product of legend in our history.

André the Giant is a known example of a man with superhuman proportions and strength, reaching 7 feet 4 inches tall. But André’s size was the result of gigantism and acromegaly, disorders caused by an overactive pituitary gland, which releases too much growth hormone. And with the average human height at 5 feet 6 inches for men and 5 feet 2 inches for women, it’s rare to find someone of André’s height, let alone his stature.”

>> Say anons! Just a thought here: Do you really think it was due to the growth hormone that André became a “giant”? Or was it that he had recessive genes from an ancient giant? = as in he is a descendant from the giants.

“With the extreme rarity of gigantism, affecting roughly three in a million, it’s surprising how often giants are spoken of in the Bible and North American folklore. David and Goliath, Jack and the Beanstalk, and Paul Bunyon are familiar examples of tales involving giants. But while these are thought to be myths or legends, is there any possibility that a race of giants once existed or were there humanoid ancestors significantly larger than us?”

>>The big notable here is that the number of people born with “giant genes” is extremely rare; as in around 3 in a million person. What does that tell you?

“The Mound Builders: Unusual Burial Sites

Across the United States, there are burial mounds, or at least their remnants, some as extensive in size as the Great Pyramid of Giza. The Cahokia and Monk’s mounds in Illinois and Missouri are two thought to have been built before the arrival of Columbus. The Cahokia mound is 100 feet tall with a 14-acre base, almost an entire acre larger than the pyramid at Giza. Monk’s Mound is just as tall with a 1,000-foot-wide base. But what makes these and other mounds of their kind even more intriguing is what has been found buried inside of them.”

>> This is the type of information researchers should look for. It’s very helpful when studying giants. I would like to remind anons of a comment I made when taking a look at the Andean region, when I mentioned the depth of the steps is an indicator of the existence of giants and not just the size of the doors. When you are a giant, you have big feet; having big feet, you need large steps to fit your feet. It’s this type of “invisible” and “silent” information that a researcher should look for and add to the study of giants because they will be helpful.

• Page 2 435 –

>>16827459

(Please read from the start)

“Jim Vieira has made it his mission to explore the mystery behind these mounds and others where there is documentation of unearthed skeletons, often of gigantic proportions. Vieira, a stonemason by trade, found himself intrigued after finding a plethora of mysterious stone.”

>> Regardless of whom it is, always check and verify the backgrounds of the people researching, mostly those “experts”.

“He found that the construction, and particularly the stonework, of these mounds, was impressive, considering the level of technology at the time. He also noticed that the orientation of the mounds was such that the entrances faced a direction that was in alignment with the sun during the Equinoxes. The mounds were built with massive stones and were present long before colonists from Europe crossed over.”

>> Good work from Vieira. It’s what needs to be checked: orientation and alignment. I would like to add that the size of the blocks, the masonry and the building technique should be compared with the megalithic blocks from the Andean Region and from the many sites we’ve seen in Phoenicia. I won’t be surprised to see similarities and even identical construction methods.

“Vieira uncovered old reports in New England of giant skeletons unearthed from these mounds, often with two rows of teeth and jaws that could fit over the head of a normal-sized human. The skeletons ranged in length from 7 to 10 feet tall. While this may sound ridiculous at first glance, it was not an isolated incident and is supported by reports from reputable news sources of the time.”

>>Vieira proceeded correctly by checking the old reports and comparing finds.

“Ancient Giants

Discoveries of the giant skeletons were found all over the Northeast, from Martha’s Vineyard and Deerfield Valley Massachusetts, to Vermont and upstate New York. Other reports of the discovery of buried giants were also found in the South, Midwest, and West coast.”

>> The Spine is the Mississippi River. Anons should check if it reaches in some way the regions mentioned. I think it would for most cases.

• Page 2 436 –

>>16827470

(Please read from the start)

“In the Ohio River Valley, a report from a local paper, that was backed up by Scientific American, found bodies of several giants buried under a ten-foot-tall mound. One female skeleton was found holding a three-and-a-half-foot long child. Another of the giant skeletons was buried in a clay coffin and an engraved stone tablet was also recovered. This particular mound was 64 feet long by 35 feet wide.”

>> This is very interesting.

“The Chichasawba mound in Arkansas is another instance of the uncovering of a giant skeleton under similar circumstances. The 12-square-mile mound had its name taken from the chief of the Shawnee tribe who was essentially known to be a giant with incredible strength. Chief Chicasawba lived in that area of Arkansas and when the mound was uncovered, the skeleton of a massive human being was found. Subsequently, other skeletons up to ten feet tall were unearthed in the same area, all with similar burial artifacts found with them. Some reports claimed the length of the skeleton’s legs to be five feet alone. Other reports show large craniums of skeletons with double rows of teeth.”

>> Each time I hear Arkansas, I’m reminded of rapist Bill and Killary. Do you think they picked that state on purpose?

“A Controlled Narrative

While stories of this nature sound fantastical, there are numerous reports of skeletons of the same size appearing in newspaper articles from The New York Times and other reputable sources. The majority of these reports occur during the mid to late 19th century, which Vieira sees as being the turning point in a censored narrative that has now dominated our history textbooks. He says he thinks that awareness of both the mounds and giants was common knowledge during this primarily agrarian time. There is even supposed reference to it from Abraham Lincoln. In a written account of a speech that he was preparing to give at Niagara Falls, he wrote,

“The eyes of that species of extinct giants, whose bones fill the mounds of America, have gazed on Niagara, as ours do now.”

>> Whom controls the narrative? Anyone surprised to see the DATE? = Gilded Age. What did Qteam say about History books? We already know (((they))) tried to re-write History many times; which allows (((them))) to shift the human consciousness to where (((they))) want it to be. Also, I don’t know about you dear reader, but I had a huge smile, from ear to ear, on my face, when I read what Lincoln said about Niagara Falls and the giants. Do you remember what we found out about Niagara Falls? Whom used to live in the caves behind the falls? The pieces of the puzzle are nicely coming together, aren’t they?

• Page 2 437 –

>>16827480

(Please read from the start)

“Vieira believes that a prejudiced narrative was created to discredit Native Americans or portray them as savages because if they were seen as having built the mounds it would show them as mathematically and technically advanced. Vieira says he thinks that the removal of any evidence of the giants might have occurred because they wouldn’t fit into the controlled narrative of manifest destiny. Subsequently, many of the mounds were allowed to be destroyed by settlers and farmers as America was colonized, with no regard to the reverence that the natives held for them.”

>> I totally agree with Vieira. He’s spot on.

“And whether the tall skeletons belonged to a race of giant natives themselves or another race that predated them is unknown, but it is thought that the American Indians venerated them.

Another conspiracy surrounding the hidden history of these giants points to the Smithsonian. Within the ethnology reports of the museum, there are 17 cases of the Smithsonian uncovering giant skeletons over seven feet tall. The probability of a human growing seven feet tall is .000007 percent, meaning they would have had to excavate roughly 2.5 million bodies to have found that many skeletons of that size.”

>> This is not the only “mysterious” case the Smithsonian is involved in. Only God knows what really took place there and what is in their little secret vaults. But we do know whom the Smithsonian works for, don’t we?

“There are also supposed reports of the Smithsonian Institution purchasing giant skeletons excavated by citizens, which then disappeared, never to be heard from again.

The Smithsonian even had a division for exploring mounds, of which there is a written record of them uncovering giant skeletons whose bones crumbled to dust when exposed to air. Was this a coverup by the famed museum, or did they simply dispose of a debunked myth?”

>> It’s mostly a cover up story. Such bones are extremely precious since they contain DNA.

This is it for this article.

• Page 2 438 –

>>16827487

(Please read from the start)

One last article; this one is like an overall view: https://www.ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/giants-north-america-005196

“UPDATED 12 FEBRUARY, 2022 - HUGH NEWMAN

Top Ten Giant Discoveries in North America

The Iroquois, the Osage, the Tuscaroras, the Hurons, the Omahas, and many other North American Indians all speak of giant men who once lived and roamed in the territories of their forefathers. All over what is now the U.S. are traditions of these ancient giants.

Over 1000 accounts of seven-foot and taller skeletons have reportedly been unearthed from ancient burial sites over a two-hundred-year period in North America. Newspaper accounts, town and county histories, letters, scientific journals, diaries, photos, and Smithsonian ethnology reports have carefully documented this. These skeletons have been reported from coast to coast with strange anatomic anomalies such as double rows of teeth, jawbones so large as to fit over the face of the finder, and elongated skulls, documented in virtually every state.”

>> Why are there anatomic anomalies?

“Smithsonian scientists identified at least 17 skeletons that stood at over seven feet in their annual reports, including one example that was 8 feet tall, and a skull with a 36-inch circumference reported from Anna, Illinois in the Smithsonian Annual Report of 1873, (an average human skull is about 20 inches in circumference). The Smithsonian Institution is mentioned dozens more times as the recipient of enormous skeletons from across the entire United States.

The skeletons mentioned no longer seem to exist regardless of their actual size, and the remaining ones that were on display were removed and repatriated by NAGPRA (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act). While the authors certainly support this law, it does present a moral and ethical conundrum in terms of trying to ascertain the proof everyone wants to see - physical evidence of giants.

In this unique Top Ten, we look at some examples of giant skeletons that were reported from across ancient North America (although we warn you now that Number 1 is so large, we admit it may not be authentic).

Our countdown begins at one of the most important mound sites in America, and quite possibly the world.

TOP TEN GIANTS

1. Serpent Mound, Ohio, 1890s – 7 ft tall skeleton

The Great Serpent Mound is a 1,370 ft. long prehistoric effigy mound located near Peebles that has been thoroughly researched by Ross Hamilton, who has written extensively about its mysteries and the giants discovered in the area. Recent radiocarbon analysis dates it to around 321 BC. This puts it in the realm of the Andean civilization who were present in the area at this time.”

• Page 2 439 –

>>16827498

(Please read from the start)

>> Wow! Stop here for a sec. Did the reader notice the last sentence written here? = “This puts it in the realm of the Andean civilization who were present in the area at this time”. Do you remember what I said: that it seems like Viracocha traveled all the way from the Andean Region to Mexico and seems to even have reached the States? I don’t know what this article is relying on = which artifacts this article is relying on to make this statement but it’s clearly supporting what I said about Viracocha reaching the States in his travels. As for the date, well anons, all the dates worldwide should be re-examined and re-evaluated, this one is no exception.

“In the 1890s, Professor Frederic Ward Putnam excavated some of the mounds next to Serpent Mound and found only 6ft tall skeletons, but a postcard showing one 7 feet in height was recently rediscovered by researcher Jeffrey Wilson. It may have been one of those excavated by Putnam, as he was the only person to dig at the site.

Ross first published this in his book A Tradition of Giants , and it clearly states it was from Serpent Mound on the postcard, but there is still debate as to where this photo of a 7ft skeleton was actually taken. Notice that the legs are cut off at the knees, so is “7ft” what we actually see, or is it an estimation if he had his lower legs and feet attached? Could it have been more like 8 feet tall if the shins and feet were intact?

1. Cresap Mound, West Virginia, 1959 – 7ft 2in skeleton

In 1959, Dr. Donald Dragoo, the curator for the Section of Man at the Carnegie Museum, unearthed a 7 feet 2 inch skeleton during the complete excavation of the Cresap Mound in Northern West Virginia:

Dragoo published a photo of the actual skeleton in his book so there is no doubt it was authentic. Dragoo joins many other university-trained anthropologists and archaeologists who reported discovering skeletons over seven feet in length in burial mounds, often with anatomical anomalies.”

>> Why these anatomic anomalies exist? Anyone reading thought of the reason?

“A few of the professionals reporting these skeletal finds were Dr. Walter B. Jones, Moundsville Alabama (7ft 6 and many 7-footers); Dr. Forrest Clements Head of Anthropology at the University of Oklahoma (six 7ft skeletons); Dr. Donald A. Cadzow Cambridge University (7ft 5in skeleton found in Pittsburgh with many other large skeletons with anatomic anomalies reported); Dr. Byron Cummings, head of the archaeology department at the University of Arizona, considered the “ Dean of Southwestern Archaeology" (several over 8-footers); Thomas Wilson, Curator of Prehistoric Anthropology at the Smithsonian (verified an 8-foot skeleton with massive jawbone); W. J. Holland, curator of the Carnegie Museum (unearthed an over 8 ft skeleton in Pennsylvania as reported in many scientific journals including Scientific American ).”

>> We got ourselves a nice list here. Don’t forget to verify each and every single one of these people if you are digging in this tunnel.

• Page 2 440 –