Anonymous ID: 916b44 July 27, 2022, 12:50 p.m. No.16844941   🗄️.is 🔗kun

New Bill to Boost Missile Defense for Israel & Arab Partners, Citing Alleged Iran Threat

 

Lawmakers with the bipartisan Abraham Accords Caucus have introduced a bill in the House and Senate that will require the Pentagon to coordinate missile defense upgrades for Israel and several newfound Arab allies, pointing to potential “attacks from Iran.”

 

Unveiled on Thursday, the Deterring Enemy Forces and Enabling National Defenses (DEFEND) Act would instruct the secretary of defense to “develop an acquisition approach” to improve anti-air weapons for a number of Middle Eastern states, among them Israel, Iraq, Jordan, Egypt and the six-member Gulf Cooperation Council.

 

The legislation will aim to “implement an integrated and missile defense capability to protect the people, infrastructure and territory of such countries from cruise and ballistic missiles, manned and unmanned aerial systems and rocket attacks from Iran and groups linked to Iran.”

 

If passed, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin will be required to submit a report to Congress within 180 days on the current defense capabilities of the states in question and how they could be improved.

 

Announced by Republican Senator Joni Ernst, the bill marks the first piece of legislation brought by the Abraham Accords Caucus, a bipartisan bloc within the House and Senate created to “build on the success” of a series of agreements struck between Israel and Arab nations starting in 2020. The senator claimed the law would help to contain Iranian proxy groups, which she said were targeting innocent civilians and “pose a persistent threat to our homeland.”

 

Though Ernst acknowledged most Americans are fed up with decades of armed intervention in the Middle East, she argued that “radical Islamic terror” continues to menace the United States, saying terrorism “can only be deterred and denied if American allies and partners in the Middle East step up and take on the threat posed by Iran.”

 

According to Democratic Senator Jacky Rosen, the bill has the endorsement of several pro-Israel groups and hawkish think tanks, including the Anti-Defamation League, AIPAC, the American Jewish Committee, CUFI Action, the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), the American Jewish Congress, the Atlantic Council and the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA).

 

In backing the legislation, the neoconservative-leaning FDD said Washington should “continue to initiate, develop and enhance military to military relationships between the US, Israel and other US allies and partners in the region” as an “extension” of the Abraham Accords.

 

Kicked off with a US-brokered normalization deal between Israel and the United Arab Emirates in 2020, the Accords have since been joined by Bahrain, Egypt, Morocco and Sudan, each agreeing to establish diplomatic and economic ties with Tel Aviv after decades of enmity.

 

Though the new bill is largely concerned with Iran, some countries slated to receive increased US military assistance have been accused of backing jihadist militant groups in the past, chief among them Saudi Arabia. Few of the 10 states named in the law could qualify as democracies, moreover, putting it at odds with President Joe Biden’s frequent lip service to the importance of ‘democratic values.’

 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/new-bill-boost-missile-defense-israel-arab-partners-citing-alleged-iran-threat/5783189

Anonymous ID: 916b44 July 27, 2022, 12:52 p.m. No.16845352   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8559

Question 8

>>16844167

>Jim, why did you interview someone who makes "music for infants" that has "hidden messages" in it?

>>16845098

>You seem to know more about him than I do.

>>16844226

>All I did was google his name, Jim. You spoke to him for over an hour. How do you know him? Why did you interview him?

>>16844993

>Do you watch my show? I talk to all sorts of people. If it is any consolation, I barely remember the interview because I didn't get along with him.

 

Question 9

>>16844445

>1. Do you acknowledge that babyfist and/or someone associated with him used his global volunteer account to post on Q's private board?

>2. Do you acknowledge that you fired babyfist for this reason?

>3. If you fired babyfist for this reason, do you acknowledge that a global volunteer posting on a private board goes against your internal policies for GV's?

>4. Did you investigate how this was allowed to happen? Did you ask babyfist who made the unauthorized post?

>5. Re: 'that is not my board to edit.' It was not babyfist's board to edit either. Why was nothing done beyond firing babyfist?

JW Response

>>16843804

>Well, sounds like you have been listening to the shills who keep asking these questions, even after I have answered them. Some of them on this very thread. I'm not going to waste cycles retyping it. Read the back log.

>Go to Tora3.com/newsnetwork and look at the video on February 17. It includes a conversation with babyfist. It's the one the shills always say is porno. You know the image. It gets posted a lot.

>Don't ask again. I am not going to answer again.

 

Question 10

>>16845099

>Jim, if a landlord broke into a tenant's house without the tenant's permission and took a shit on their bed, should he not clean it up?

>Why is it ok to delete things on this board, which belongs to all anons, but it's not ok to delete a post on a private board, that was made by someone other than the Board Owner?

>Unless you believe the Board Owner (Q) is the same person as the one who made the "B" post (babyfist's "fren") why would you leave the post up?

>>16844672

>Fuck off scatophile.

>>16844093

>That was a legit question - not a scatophile post.

>The reasoning behind the B post remaining hasn't ever been fully explained.

>And it matters because of Q's history detailed in the drops of how he reacts to board fuckery of that kind.

>>16844347

>It's not my board, and I dealt with it as I did.

>I made that decision, and I am not going to change it. Q can come back and delete it if he wants.

 

Question 11

>>16844394

>Are you aware of a warrant canary question's existence?

>>16845154

>I don't play that warrant canary game.

Warrant Canary is at the bottom of every bread, how could Jim not know this?

Anonymous ID: 916b44 July 27, 2022, 12:53 p.m. No.16845770   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Dr. Pierre Gilbert on magnetic vaccines

as quoted in

https://rumble.com/v16w9nr-inhuman-frequencies-can-they-trigger-genocide.html