dChan
Anonymous ID: 320570 July 27, 2022, 4:35 p.m. No.16860258   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0706 >>1243

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Thursday that Americans have a right to carry guns in public, a major expansion of gun rights.

 

The justices’ 6-3 decision follows a series of recent mass shootings and is expected to ultimately allow more people to legally carry guns on the streets of the nation’s largest cities — including New York, Los Angeles and Boston — and elsewhere. About a quarter of the U.S. population lives in states expected to be affected by the ruling, the high court’s first major gun decision in more than a decade.

 

The ruling comes as Congress is actively working on gun legislation following recent mass shootings in Texas,New York and California.

 

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the majority that the Constitution protects “an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home.”

 

In their decision, the justices struck down a New York law requiring people to demonstrate a particular need for carrying a gun in order to get a license to carry one in public. The justices said the requirement violates the Second Amendment right to “keep and bear arms.”

 

California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Rhode Island all have similar laws. The Biden administration had urged the justices to uphold New York’s law.

 

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-guns-decision-58d01ef8bd48e816

Anonymous ID: 320570 July 27, 2022, 4:37 p.m. No.16860534   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1115 >>2627

>>16860289

naw thanks

Does it relate to actual history or to Q research.

Now I see why you hate everyone else's contribution; You have your own sect.

Or

are you just a complete fake, as what it appears.

Aren't people who actually follow the teachings and the blessings of Lord Jesus slightly more mature?

Are you just 10 years old? Is that it?

Anonymous ID: 320570 July 27, 2022, 4:39 p.m. No.16860779   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Rumble Proposes an Open-Source Content Moderation Policy

 

Seems like weak sauce but maybe they can develop it into something. I have an issue with the phrase "attacking other users". Mean words?

 

d. discriminating against others based on their legally protected status, such as attacking other users or content creators on the platform, based on that user’s race, religion, or other legally protected status;

 

https://corp.rumble.com/blog/rumble-proposes-an-open-source-content-moderation-policy-process-to-improve-transparency-put-creators-first/