projection
Stalking profiles and making them your clickbait is not sexy either. fyi Did she hut anybody? No?
Go fuck yourself then.
sum jokes kinda write themselves, eh.
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv
NOW - Biden: "Pride is back at the White House."
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1537174464693157894
what 'god' requires (((shekels)))?
WaPo Gloomy over the Texas Abortion Law Saving Twins: ‘Glimpse of What Much of the Country Would Face’
Texas’s six-week abortion ban, which went into effect last year, has saved lives, but the Washington Post chose to showcase one such instance in a gloomy light, featuring the story of a Lone Star State teen who found out she was pregnant two days before the law went into effect.
“Brooke Alexander turned off her breast pump at 6:04 p.m. and brought two fresh bottles of milk over to the bed, where her 3-month-old twins lay flat on their backs, red-faced and crying,” the Post began, giving a peek into the life of the 18-year-old who gave birth to twins Kendall and Olivia.
The Post explained that the teen discovered she was pregnant August 29, two days before the Texas heartbeat bill, which bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, became law. After discovering her pregnancy, she went to her best friend’s house where they discussed options, telling him that abortion could be on the table. However, her friend reminded her of the new law taking effect. A nearby abortion clinic reportedly had no openings before the law went into effect, and her remaining options were 13 hours away in New Mexico.
According to the Post, the abortion law has served as a “major inconvenience” for women, as they have to search for abortion clinics out of state (thats kind of the point WAPO, where babies die in darkness if you got your wish) to sidestep abortion restrictions in their home state. Not to mention, the outlet added, the rising price of gas.
However, she found a place, Pregnancy Center of the Coastal Bend, that performed an ultrasound to see how far along her pregnancy was. According to the Post, “she had no idea she’d walked into a facility designed to dissuade people from getting abortions.”
As it turned out, she was 12 weeks along with twins:
Brooke felt like she was floating above herself, watching the scene below. Her mom was calling the twins “my babies,” promising Brooke she would take care of everything, as the ultrasound technician told her how much she loved being a twin.
If she really tried, Brooke thought she could make it to New Mexico. Her older brother would probably lend her the money to get there. But she couldn’t stop staring at the pulsing yellow line on the ultrasound screen.
She wondered: If her babies had heartbeats, as these women said they did, was aborting them murder? Eventually, Arnholt [Angie Arnholt, a counselor at the pregnancy center] turned to Brooke and asked whether she’d be keeping them. Brooke heard herself saying “yes.”
“Who’s to say what I would have done if the law wasn’t in effect?” Brooke Alexander said. “I don’t want to think about it.”
“I can’t just really be free,” she added. “I guess that really sums it up. That’s a big thing that I really miss.”
She also ended up marrying her boyfriend, which might not have happened if she was able to easily abort her twins, completely altering her current reality.
The Post concluded that the story offers a “glimpse” into what women across the nation would face if, indeed, the Supreme Court overrules Roe v. Wade, framing the entire story with an air of uncertainty and gloom of what could have been, if not for the abortion law taking effect.
That could have, very possibly, changed Brooke’s mind and the outcome of having her babies.
Indeed, the Post’s story comes as the nation awaits the Supreme Court’s decision on Roe v. Wade following a leaked draft opinion penned by Justice Samuel Alito overturning the landmark ruling, which would thereby put the decision in the hands of the states, each of which could make its own abortion laws.
Most Americans believe abortion should be “mostly” or “always” illegal, a Fox News poll released last month found. And according to an October study by the University of Texas at Austin, Lone Star State abortions declined by 50 percent in September compared to the prior year, after the law took effect, saving countless lives.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/06/21/wapo-gloomy-over-texas-abortion-law-saving-twins-glimpse-much-country-would-face/
Theres the Great Awakening…Suicide Weekend
>Created a 1-week ban on /qresearch/ (#193672) with reason: ebot
BUT HE PROVIDES THE MOST INSIGHT!
there are private messages on sys.8kun.top - those should be utilized by the BO and BVs first and foremost. maybe they have a private discord or group chat somewhere where they can get notifications, fine. but 1) it should be kept strictly board related. i wouldn't and shouldn't know what they have for breakfast and and shit. you can be friendly and private, the way anons used to be on here pre-facebook-like status updates. and 2) if they want to engage with other communities outside of the exclusive board staff one, they should be doing it under different identities, unknown to each other.
the main thing is boundaries. there should be boundaries. boundaries prevent emotions and human drama from clouding judgement. if there's drama, i would get rid of whoever is causing it, simple as that. this is or at least was the most important forum on the planet. there should be no tolerance for bullshit. PDJT has no problem firing people. i would've fired the BVs that were creating problems before 8bit handed over the keys.
>Because it depends on the entire team and their preferences.
no it doesn't and shouldn't. it should depend on the owner of the board. the BVs would have to fall in line. the tone and example is always set at the top. we're seeing that now very clearly with the usurper in office, and the stark contrast with PDJT.
>But what does it mean that they aren't called out on it?
they should be but anons got used to this behavior with the last 2 famefag BOs.
this was clearly a hostile takeover endorsed or enabled by jim, whether it was with/for good intentions or not. no one should be ok with that. if they were going to plan shit, they should have done it openly for us all to see. if it was innocent at least, but it wasn't. it was sketchy.
i don't trust current or former board staff. that's why i'm hopeful the "new board" post was a call to some anon out there to create their own board and run it well, the way it deserves to be run, and ONLY with Q's endorsement. (for the record, i don't think there should be any side boards. we shouldn't be balkanized like this - but i know that's naive of me. what happened to WWG1WGA?
I'm sorry, we're all out of guac because of supply chain issues. Try the new cicada salsa.