Anonymous ID: 1fb68e July 28, 2022, 1:23 a.m. No.16884754   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5946 >>7200 >>9252 >>9570 >>7444

>>16884518

I saw him give his recap of his testimony and he said he was on the cover of Rolling Stone, and I didn't get it. Now I do. Link to him talking about his testimony below. He is under a gag order so there's not much he said. Didn't talk to Congress members of course. got their lawyers instead.

https://tora3.com/video/c776f5c706eeafb7a295e531d7b57b9f

Anonymous ID: 1fb68e July 28, 2022, 1:25 a.m. No.16884891   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7651 >>2119

>>16884780

JESUS LOPEZ.

>>16884231

>>16883898

 

-Paul Pelosi, 82, was arrested last month for drunk driving after he drove his Porsche into the path of oncoming Jeep driven by Jesus Lopez, 48

 

Pelosi, who had a blood alcohol content of 0.08%, is scheduled to appear in court over the incident on August 3

 

The new development comes after DailyMail.com revealed Pelosi was involved in a smash that killed his brother David when he was 16

Anonymous ID: 1fb68e July 28, 2022, 1:54 a.m. No.16887573   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2620 >>9957

>>16887113

Clinton is also part of the Democratic Party old guard that blame Russian President Vladimir Putin when they stub their toe. In just the latest example, President Joe Biden said last week: “We've never seen anything like Putin’s tax on both food and gas,” in addressing the inflation that has spiked under Biden’s watch and policies. Putin isn’t taxing anyone in America, just like he didn’t “steal” the 2016 presidential election from Hillary Clinton. But Clinton has publicly blamed “Russian WikiLeaks” for her loss to Donald Trump, referring to WikiLeaks’ release of her campaign manager’s emails (and also “misogyny”), which revealed a cozy, arguably collusive, relationship between the Clinton campaign and the press to Trump’s detriment.

 

Instead of soul searching about why that might have turned off voters who don’t appreciate being manipulated, or acknowledging the complexities and challenges of technical attribution for any such breaches, it’s no doubt easier to just blame Putin.

 

Clinton really doesn’t risk much in doing so. Hollywood loves a good villain and Washington can always capitalize on a dramatic narrative that simplifies complex diplomacy into good versus evil. As Secretary of State, Clinton oversaw the NATO bombing of Libya, the migration blowback from which Europe is still feeling.

 

“We came, we saw, he died,” Clinton jubilated on the set of an interview when she found out that Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi had been liquidated in what was essentially a NATO-backed coup. Clinton reacted to Gaddafi’s death like her team had just won the Super Bowl, rather than treating it like a major geopolitical event with serious and lasting repercussions for regional stability.

 

Clinton was equally reckless towards Syria in her role as top diplomat, as she cheered the failed US-backed regime-change war against President Bashar Assad through the use of Pentagon and CIA-backed “Syrian rebels.” “We think Assad must go,” Clinton told ABC News. “The sooner the better for everyone concerned.”

 

Russia was ultimately left to clean up the mess that she helped cause, lest a “Big Bang” of jihadists disperse and find their way to Eurasia. But Clinton clearly couldn’t see past the end of her nose in assessing a potential fallout.

 

So it’s not exactly shocking that Clinton is now advocating in favor of Putin’s removal from office and the prolongation of the Ukraine conflict. It’s certainly not Clinton who’s going to be paying any kind of price in the event that her misguided advice is pursued, but rather the average Ukrainian, European, and Russian whose interests she’s treating like pawns. And if Emmanuel Macron needed any convincing that his recent stance in favor of peace sooner rather than later in Ukraine – along with the normalization of relations with Russia – is indeed the right path, the fact that Clinton is against it should be reassuring.

 

https://www.rt.com/russia/557210-clinton-criticized-macrons-diplomacy/

Anonymous ID: 1fb68e July 28, 2022, 3:05 a.m. No.16893927   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16891837

Well Congress voting "DC" in as a state, means a referendum needs to be put to ballot. The current special rules governing DC become defunct and any special accommodations given to Congress must be approved by the Governor, State legislature of the "DC". Congress loses governing control of the "DC" entity.

They might be surprised whom actually takes control.

 

https://www.thoughtco.com/us-statehood-process-3322311