>>169088

>>169079

You're onto something Anons — Can ANYONE verify that Nordstrom bag… Is that from 2017 holiday? These retailer change bags all the time..

>>169112

Nevermind … just verified it's from this last December

poshmark.com/listing/4-Nordstrom-Christmas-Shopping-Bags-1-Lrg-3-Med-56f55327eaf030162d00305b

>>169129

Wait a second… that's NOT THE SAME BAG FROM 2017

Wait a second… that's NOT THE SAME BAG FROM 2017

Wait a second… that's NOT THE SAME BAG FROM 2017

Wait a second… that's NOT THE SAME BAG FROM 2017

Source for 2017 bag: poshmark.com/listing/4-Nordstrom-Christmas-Shopping-Bags-1-Lrg-3-Med-56f55327eaf030162d00305b

>>169143

Thanks anon, I realized my mistake at the same sec…

>>169159

That's what I'm trying to verify right now.. is there another version of that bag…

www.themidlifefashionista.com/2015/12/partying-nordstrom-style.html

ANother bag picture from 2015… same design as 2017's

This rathole goes deeper

>>169179

apparently…..

Sorry Anons, my link to the 2017 bag had a post in Dec 28, 2017 BUT there is no proof that that bag was from 2017… something to keep in mind…

link from this Anon may be the actual 2017 bag which looks like Peter Strozk's bag >>169171

PUT YOUR TORCHES AND PITCHFORKS BACK, ANONS.

>>169184

>>169187

yeah, got a little carried away.. Peter Strozk is a mystery for sure. So few pictures exist.. Thought i was onto something – and the GS-focus got me thinking the wrong way..

Continue on