What would anons actually do with full disclosure?

That's the question I want to know.

If Q told you everything, what would you actually do?

How much do you know now?

How much have you actually changed your lifestyle?

Please, do not lie.

Deception to another is deception to one's self.

Just a bread or two ago, there were numerous anons almost celebrating how they ate the food of the cabal.

How many of you still listen to the music, watch shows, watch movies of the cabal?

How many of you still eat the meat the cabal produces?

How many of you are still literally digesting suffering?

How is your spiritual health, anons?

What would you do if Q gave you full disclosure?

What are you doing now with you life with partial disclosure you've found?

There's a difference between knowing and believing, anons.

If you want full disclosure, you must prove you are ready for it. The decision to know will be yours, after all, and that decision is reached by understanding what it means to know and what it means to believe.

If you don't believe, the cognitive dissonance may drive you mad.

I am not saying this to upset you or cause division but to point out the flaw inherent the course you want to set for yourselves.

You must prepare for full disclosure before you are ready for full disclosure. You will not accept full disclosure unless you are ready to believe it. If you do not believe it, then full disclosure will be lies, shilling, and clowns to you.

You will turn on Q and this movement if you are not wise.

>>1690307

I would think much less.

I feel only a handful actually BELIEVE.

As in, maybe 3-4.

Believe in that they've taken the steps to change their lives so they're not playing the cabal's game anymore.

Most others know for sure, but they don't believe.

Rid yourselves of the poverty inside as well, anons.

>>1690389

Play cabal games.

Win cabal prizes.

>>1690392

I still am not fully ready.

I will be, though.

Every day, it gets closer.

Soon, I drop weed entirely.

Soon, as in this week.

>>1690546

Q already said we have more than we know.

What have we done with it?

What have you done with it?

What have I done with it?

Before the shills say anything, I am not saying to commit violence. I am saying to take account of your own life as well.

As it is within, so it outside.

Ultimately, I believe anons can get there. I have faith in humanity as well. However, there is a process to everything and certain steps should not be skipped.

A good urgeon washes his hands before surgery.

>>1690533

Sorry, I just realized there is a question here.

Yes, I have, in fact.

More accurately, I read a portion of the beginning and then skimmed as I am apt to do sometimes.

I will read it again later, probably.

>>1690601

>Memed a new reality.

I still smile at the glory of that. You've made a very good point. It shows to me that we are very capable, so it's not as if we will never be ready for full disclosure.

>Reversed my course of apathy.

I'm happy for you, anon. Apathy is a terrible feeling to endure.

Ultimately, anons, it will be funny if full disclosure already happened.

>>1690724

I understand the problem that you are illuminating. It is interesting that you bring up the Matrix, for I believe it does answer your questions.

To note, despite all to protagonists (save the Oracle who is a program) being red-pilled out of the matrix, only one of them actually freed themselves from being a slave to the system entirely.

I say this because despite knowing what the matrix was, they still in their heart-of-hearts, didn't believe it. So, they allowed themselves to be subservient to the rules of the matrix.

Yet, without them, Neo would not have been found.

Without them, there would not have been a refuge for humanity in the first place.

Without them, there would not have been a resistance against the evil entities harvesting our minds and bodies.

Without the crew of the Nebuchadnezzar, there would not have been a Neo.

Without Neo, the protagonists might not have succeeded.

This illustrates an excellent point that I think I need to clarify:

I am not saying that anons are worthless in any regard if they are not ready for full disclosure.

Quite the opposite. Like you so aptly said before, anon, full disclosure probably isn't necessary for anyone. And the movement has done well without it so far. I will not judge Q negatively for not outright stating the complete Truth.

I am not the gatekeeper to decide who is ready, either. You will now if you are ready. Whether or not you choose to listen to your inner wisdom is another thing altogether.

When I say, "You", I do not mean solely you that I replied to, anons, but other anons.