is this thing on?
TYB
Can you regex null fields?
my regex game is weak.
maybe we should all become namefags
is this thing on?
TYB
Can you regex null fields?
my regex game is weak.
maybe we should all become namefags
Welcome Aboard fren.
Did you fags hear?
Namefagging is cool now
>Or just filter the Spam bot.
>It's lonely in here bros
>Or just filter the Spam bot.
>It's lonely in here bros
>Ok I guess that's the deal then. Let's hope they will not learn how to namefag…
Then you go Randomized name per bread.
and someregex wiz gonna have to come up with a 'filter everything not this namefag' code.
Or codemonkey codes us a filter to include.
called out by baker maybe
>and someregex wiz gonna have to come up with
My other idea was a hashtag message in the comments. You could randomize it too
>post image with text to prove hooman.
>bot doesnt do images
Another option but we know the bots can do images.
Maybe if anons included the same image?
>a377f8
<>"It is not the site of a satanic pedophilia cult," Tapper shot back. "It is a f– pizzeria. Show me what you're talking about that proves a satanic pedophilia cult. Your tweet is wildly irresponsible. Listen to me. You are going to get someone killed. Maybe an innocent child. For what??????"
RRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
This is a great reminder of why the fake news has gone nuts.
Tapper's post 2016 election Panic was off the charts. Probably because
Jake Tapper Loves Him Some Comet Pizza
>oop i thought specific spam from hell one wasn't doing images.
you're correct. My response was confusing. I think it's a good idea. Current iteration of spam bot isn't doing images from the looks of it.
I was kinda of planning ahead. Once it adapts and starts posting images, then maybe we do a specific image per bread
>i need an explanation why no turn on captcha per post
Long history for that. To sum it up, to combat shills, Old BO turned captcha per post on. Most anons objected. Q then said the shills can bypass captcha.
>but now i'm thinking it's ok to do it at least temporarily esp if it'll combat bot from hell
kek
I agree. Give it a try.
I actually thought it helped and had bread time counts to support it.
Now Old Board owner wound up being a shill.
What if it worked and Q said turn it off since it causes issues for them posting accurate timestamps?
>The System: Adam Schiff
>Tallulah
>dog COMMs?
What was the date of the dog vid?
Noname marker day just passed a couple of days ago.
>IF DOUGH GETS SPAMMED JUST KEEP MOVING FORWARD
>-Create Spam Threads
>-Tag Doughs with Notables
>-Add pic to your post to prove Hooman
submitting some other options.
something to think about.
It was awfully comfy
Option A - Everyone namefag, filter spambot
>Welcome Aboard fren.
>Did you fags hear?
>Namefagging is cool now
>>16908524 Comment Hastags for Ctrl F or inverse filter
>>16908179 Post Images
>>16909019 If Bot starts posting image, baker post per bread image
>Comment Hastags for Ctrl F or inverse filter
###BeePBoop###
or maybe
some Spolier Text
###IamARussianBot###
To sum up for those anons that filter all namefags.
They would've missed muh russian bot posts
>Namefag
>Filter the Spambot - Anonymous
>Profit
You can even Hide Filtered Stub for maximum Profits