>>1690977

I don't really have a strong opinion on the Qclock, but it does have it's own thread now.

The branding is the main issue. This was sent to me earlier from many many anons. It's an excerpt from the Q-Army discord server (Pic also related).

>"If we band together, we can OWN the notables."

>"See every time it says "(You)" in this list of Notables? That's us! We're FameFags! Three Notables in one bread. That's absolutely magnificent! All of our hard work bore fruit!"

I appreciate the work being done by clockfags, but statements like ^^^above doesn't give them a good look.

>>1691130

Just be aware is all. I know everyone is working towards the same goal, but things like famefagging will rub anons the wrong way… And fill my inbox.

No reason to stop progress on the clock. There are so many of us branching out into different areas of research so I don't see anything wrong with groups of anons researching down that path.

>>1691250

Current bread now links to https://8ch.net/qresearch/rules.html

>>1691117

Baker, please edit the dough to include the new link. Thanks bro.

>>1691326

>Even seen my Q Research is a fraud post on Alex Jones.

Hahahaha!

>>1691404

https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/

>>1691411

I've set the board to only accept 1 of the same image per thread, however, it's currently bugged. Waiting on CM to fix.

>>1691464

Anon, I already did. See >>1691319

The baker has already made the changes in the dough as well.

>>1691497

Per thread, once the feature is fixed.

>>1691511

Only your spam has been deleted.

>>1691535

Good call. I'll work something out in the welcome page.

>>1691557

Refresh your page.

>>1691551

>>1691559

No idea who they are, but yeah I need more pixels for TinEye.