Anonymous ID: 38d4c2 July 28, 2022, 12:33 p.m. No.16925753   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>16921310

Military Might

 

President Trump built up the strength of the American military when he was in office, expanding military spending and even creating a new branch of the armed forces, the Space Force.

 

In 2020, National Interest reported that President Trump requested a whopping $740 billion for national defense as a part of his ongoing bipartisan defense buildup. Military aircraft readiness was projected to increase under Trump and the Naval fleet was slightly expanded. Their report additionally pointed out that Trump’s administration worked to fortify nuclear defenses, developed a new line of ballistic-missile submarines, and hypersonic missiles and AI defense systems were improved.

 

Trump was additionally known as the “President of Peace.” He achieved stunning success in his diplomatic endeavors ranging from the historic Abraham Accords (between the State of Israel, the U.S. and the UAE) to his ability to maintain peace with the volatile North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un.

 

Biden, by contrast, has weakened the U.S. military. Under his leadership, the military has displaced service members due to astringent Covid-related vaccine requirements, which has resulted in the discharge of countless men and women in uniform.

 

Even worse, the U.S. military is now struggling to meet its 2022 recruiting goal, according to NBC. Only a reported 9 percent of Americans 17-24 are interested in serving.

 

BREAKING: Every branch of the U.S. military is struggling to meet its 2022 recruiting goal

 

Only 9% of those Americans 17-24 eligible to serve in the military have any inclination to do so.

 

Only 23% of Americans ages 17-24 are qualified to serve without a waiver to join

 

– NBC

— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) June 28, 2022

 

In less than two years, war in Eastern Europe has erupted between Russia and Ukraine – all on Biden’s watch.

 

Trump’s bold, unflinching America First diplomatic approach to dealing with foreign nations kept the U.S. safe and secure when he was in office.

 

“This is something that should have never happened; this would not have happened during my administration,” Trump reminded Americans during an interview on Fox News in February. “…It’s a very sad thing for the world, for the country, and it’s certainly sad for a lot of people that are going to be needlessly killed.”

Anonymous ID: 38d4c2 July 28, 2022, 12:34 p.m. No.16925774   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>16924168

>Seriously pisses Karen off that the real Q that got a verified 0 Delta with PDJT went to /hivemind/ and thanked the BO

Notice how the ONLY Q poster we can directly connect to POTUS didn't thank Graveyard Baker. Wonder why?

Anonymous ID: 38d4c2 July 28, 2022, 12:37 p.m. No.16926058   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>16923589

 

Clusters

A 2017 version of the map had countries divided into nine clusters: the English-speaking, Latin America, Catholic Europe, Protestant Europe, African-Islamic, Baltic, South Asian, Orthodox and Confucian clusters.[1] In previous studies, the African-Islamic cluster was split into two (the African cluster and the Islamic cluster) and the Baltic states did not have their own cluster.[7]

 

Another proposed way to cluster the societies is by material wealth, with the poorer societies at the bottom of both axes, and richer at the top.[8]

 

Country-specific analysis

Out of Western world countries, the United States is among the most conservative (as one of the most downwards-located countries), together with highly conservative Catholic countries such as Ireland and Poland.[9] Simoni concludes that "On the traditional/secular dimension, the United States ranks far below other rich societies, with levels of religiosity and national pride comparable with those found in some developing societies."[6]

 

Asian societies are distributed in the traditional/secular dimension in two clusters, with more secular Confucian societies at the top, and more traditional South Asian ones at the center of the map.[10]

 

Russia is among the most survival-value oriented countries, and at the other end, Sweden ranks highest on the self-expression chart.[5]

 

It has also been found that basic cultural values overwhelmingly apply on national lines, with cross-border intermixtures being relatively rare. This is true even between countries with shared cultural histories. Additionally, even cultural clusters of countries do not intermix much across borders. This suggests nations are culturally meaningful units.[11]

 

History

The map is updated and modified regularly along with the new waves of data from the World Values Survey. The different versions are available at the website of the World Values Survey.[12]

 

An early version of the map was published by Ronald Inglehart in 1997 with the dimensions named "Traditional vs. Secular-Rational Authority" and "Survival vs. Well-being".[13]

 

Inglehart and Welzel revised this map in 2005 and named the dimensions "Traditional vs. Secular-Rational Values" and "Survival vs. Self-expression Values".[8] This map and its various updates are generally referred to as the Inglehart–Welzel Cultural Map.

 

Welzel published a quite different map in 2013 with two closely related dimensions named "Emancipative Values" and "Secular Values", where Emancipative Values provide the main variable behind his theory of human empowerment.[14]

 

Other cultural maps have been published by Shalom Schwartz,[15] Michael Minkov,[16] and by Stankov, Lee and Vijver.[17]