Anonymous ID: 8a382e July 29, 2022, 11 p.m. No.16936652   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>sometimes i listen to this drivel to hear what they are saying

>mahr in favor of climate change and depopulation

>he speaks of 'finiteness' yet fake leaders let fresh water run off into the ocean (ask Nunes) and oil sit while biden begs other commie countries

>fuck mahr

https://youtu.be/HB97iwcm_Qc

New Rule: Let the Population Collapse | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO)

87,919 views

Jul 29, 2022

Anonymous ID: 8a382e July 29, 2022, 11:04 p.m. No.16936661   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>impeach recall expel fake leaders [bowser]

https://youtu.be/Rtjc3HIvFkY

#foxnews #thefive

Pavlich: Democrats are living by their own rules now on illegal immigration

219,406 views

Jul 29, 2022

Anonymous ID: 8a382e July 29, 2022, 11:25 p.m. No.16936710   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://youtu.be/Qx-7u5E4yIc

Bryson Gray - BIDEN BLAME PUTIN [Music Video] #Biden #putin

11,727 views

Premiered 14 hours ago

Anonymous ID: 8a382e July 30, 2022, 1:34 a.m. No.16936871   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6873 >>7056 >>7067

https://nypost.com/2022/07/27/hunter-biden-scandal-may-lead-right-back-to-joe/

 

All hell broke loose in Biden World the day The Post broke the first bombshell email from Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop, on Oct. 14, 2020, three weeks before the presidential election his father would win.

 

“BIDEN SECRET E-MAILS” read the front page exclusive, revealing a 2015 email from an executive at the corrupt Ukrainian energy firm Burisma, thanking Hunter for introducing him to Hunter’s then-VP ­father in Washington.

 

“Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together,” wrote Burisma board adviser Vadym Pozharskyi on April 17, 2015, less than a year after Joe Biden had forced the Ukrainian government to fire the prosecutor investigating the corrupt company that was paying Hunter $1 million a year.

 

The story put the lie to Joe’s ­repeated claims that he knew nothing about his son’s overseas business dealings — and risked sinking his presidential campaign.

 

But as soon as it broke online at 5 a.m., panicked phone calls and messages started flying between Hunter’s business partners and their advisers, even as social media giants Facebook and Twitter moved to censor the story and lock The Post’s account, while candidate Biden went into hiding.

Fear of DOJ probe

 

In one communication that day, Hunter’s then-business partner James Gilliar, a former British Special Forces officer with ties to UK intelligence services, “calmly reassures an unnamed person who is concerned that “a Senate committee, the DOJ” might start investigating Hunter’s foreign deals and then “Hunter and/or Joe or Joe’s campaign [will] fire a shot at us.” ..

Anonymous ID: 8a382e July 30, 2022, 1:36 a.m. No.16936875   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7056 >>7067

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/whistleblowers-hunter-biden-wrongly-labeled-disinformation-fbi

 

The FBI’s investigation into Hunter Biden wrongly labeled verified evidence as “disinformation,” agency whistleblowers claimed.

 

Agents investigating President Joe Biden's son "opened an assessment which was used by an FBI headquarters team to improperly discredit negative Hunter Biden information as disinformation and caused investigative activity to cease," according to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA). Grassley revealed the claim after his office received "a significant number of protected communications from highly credible whistleblowers" about the investigation. The Republican claimed one of the communications shows "verified and verifiable derogatory information on Hunter Biden was falsely labeled as disinformation."

 

JOE BIDEN UNWITTINGLY HELPED FINANCE HUNTER BIDEN'S TRYSTS WITH RUSSIA-LINKED ESCORTS

 

FBI supervisory intelligence agent Brian Auten opened in August 2020 the assessment that was later used by the agency, according to the disclosures. One of the whistleblowers claimed the FBI assistant special agent in charge of the Washington field office, Timothy Thibault, shut down a line of inquiry into Hunter Biden in October 2020 despite some of the details being known to be true at the time.

 

A whistleblower also said Thibault “ordered closed” an “avenue of additional derogatory Hunter Biden reporting," according to Grassley, even though “all of the reporting was either verified or verifiable via criminal search warrants.” The senator said Thibault “ordered the matter closed without providing a valid reason as required” and that FBI officials “subsequently attempted to improperly mark the matter in FBI systems so that it could not be opened in the future,” according to the disclosures.

 

Whistleblowers alleged investigators from an FBI headquarters team “were in communication with FBI agents responsible for the Hunter Biden information targeted by Mr. Auten's assessment” and that their findings on whether the claims were true or disinformation were placed “in a restricted access sub-file” in September 2020, according to the senator.

 

The whistleblower disclosures “appear to indicate that there was a scheme in place among certain FBI officials to undermine derogatory information connected to Hunter Biden by falsely suggesting it was disinformation," Grassley said. The new allegations, summarized by Grassley in a Monday letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray, were previously unknown.

 

The new information comes after Auten was involved in the Trump-Russia investigation, including interviewing Igor Danchenko, the alleged main source for British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s dossier in 2017. Congressional sources confirmed to the Washington Examiner that Auten is the “Supervisory Intel Agent” from DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s 2019 report on Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse.

 

Grassley said the “volume and consistency” of the whistleblower allegations “substantiate their credibility.” The claims come as the U.S. attorney’s office in Delaware is reportedly nearing a decision on whether to charge Hunter Biden, who has denied any wrongdoing. ..

Anonymous ID: 8a382e July 30, 2022, 1:38 a.m. No.16936880   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7056 >>7067

https://nypost.com/2022/06/11/the-fbi-knew-russiagate-was-a-lie-but-hid-that-truth/

 

The FBI knew the Trump-Russia collusion narrative was utter bunk even as it suggested otherwise to Congress, the courts and the public early in 2017. Evidence revealed by special counsel John Durham proves it beyond dispute.

 

At RealClearInvestigations, Paul Sperry lays out the case.

 

Declassified for Durham’s probe, a March 2017 memo prepared by Lisa Page for FBI head James Comey’s meeting with Congress’ “Gang of Eight” — the bipartisan House and Senate leaders who oversee the most classified stuff — was a total cook-up job.

 

It advised Comey to present accusations that Trump’s campaign chair Paul Manafort and foreign policy adviser Carter Page were working with the Russian government as coming from a confidential Russia-based source with real intel-community chops. In fact, the FBI had already established that the root source was US-based former Brookings flunky Igor Danchenko’s utterly speculative gossip with an ex-girlfriend and a Democratic Party hack.

 

That, plus publicly reported info, was all Christopher Steele (a retired British spy who doesn’t even speak Russian) ever had to back up his “dossier.” And the FBI knew it since at least January 2017, when it interviewed Danchenko.

 

Comey hid all this during his meetings, and after. Yet the public only learned it years later, once the Durham probe began.

 

The Comey meeting where he served up these nonsense stories prompted both House and Senate Intelligence committees to open probes. But that was hardly the only poisoned fruit. ..

Anonymous ID: 8a382e July 30, 2022, 1:53 a.m. No.16936892   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://bongino.com/ep-1818-a-bad-news-tsunami-for-biden-and-his-corrupt-family

 

Ep. 1818 A Bad News Tsunami For Biden And His Corrupt Family

 

by: Team Bongino 07/28/2022

 

Fight tech tyranny. Join Dan on Parler @dbongino.

Anonymous ID: 8a382e July 30, 2022, 5:13 a.m. No.16937210   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7215

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/grassley-johnson-controversial-2020-hunter-biden-fbi-briefing

Controversial Hunter Biden FBI briefing back in spotlight after whistleblower claims

 

Two top Senate Republicans want answers on a controversial summer 2020 FBI briefing, as whistleblower disclosures claim the bureau improperly labeled evidence on Hunter Biden “disinformation” around the same time.

 

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray this week asking for more details about an Aug. 2020 briefing on alleged Russian influence efforts that he says were pushed on him and then leaked to the press to hurt his investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden. Whistleblowers revealed to him recently that FBI officials were undercutting or burying facts about President Joe Biden’s son around the same time.

 

FBI supervisory intelligence analyst Brian Auten opened an assessment in Aug. 2020 that “was used by a FBI Headquarters team to improperly discredit negative Hunter Biden information as disinformation and caused investigative activity to cease,” according to whistleblower disclosures.

 

“Importantly, it’s been alleged to my office that Auten’s assessment was opened in August 2020, which is the same month that Senator Johnson and I received an unsolicited and unnecessary briefing from the FBI that purportedly related to our Biden investigation and a briefing for which the contents were later leaked in order paint the investigation in a false light,” Grassley told Garland and Wray on Monday.

 

The senator’s letter said congressional Democrats asked for a briefing in July 2020 “from the very same FBI HQ team that discredited the derogatory Hunter Biden information.”

 

WHISTLEBLOWERS SAY FBI WRONGLY LABELED HUNTER BIDEN EVIDENCE AS DISINFO

 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), then-Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), the Senate Intelligence Committee’s then-Vice Chairman Mark Warner (D-VA), and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) wrote to Wray in July 2020 that they were “gravely concerned, in particular, that Congress appears to be the target of a concerted foreign interference campaign, which seeks to launder and amplify disinformation.” Grassley and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) repeatedly denied pushing disinformation at the time.

 

Grassley told Wray and Garland that the claims from that 2020 letter "were later leaked to the press to try and smear our Biden investigation as unrelated foreign disinformation.” Grassley also said two Senate Democrats then requested another July 2020 briefing from the FBI team that had wrongly shot down Hunter Biden evidence.

 

“The concurrent opening of Auten’s assessment, the efforts by the FBI HQ team, and the efforts by the FBI to provide an unnecessary briefing to me and Senator Johnson that provided our Democratic colleagues fodder to falsely accuse us of advancing foreign disinformation draws serious concern,” Grassley told Garland and Wray.

 

Auten was involved in the Trump-Russia investigation, interviewing Igor Danchenko, the alleged main source for British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s dossier, in 2017. Auten had been referred by Wray for potential disciplinary action following the release of DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz's 2019 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse report, though Wray said those proceedings were slowed down to cooperate with special counsel John Durham’s criminal investigation.

 

Johnson sent his own letter Wednesday to Garland, Wray, Horowitz, and Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines about the controversial briefing on Wednesday, claiming he had spent nearly two years seeking information from the FBI and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. ..

Anonymous ID: 8a382e July 30, 2022, 5:17 a.m. No.16937215   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7249

>>16937210

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/fbi-analyst-disciplinary-review-fisa-hunter-biden-assessment

 

FBI analyst who helped shut down Hunter Biden inquiry earlier referred for disciplinary action

 

The FBI analyst who wrongly labeled Hunter Biden evidence as "disinformation" was referred for disciplinary action just months before doing so, whistleblowers claim.

 

Brian Auten, a supervisory intelligence analyst within the bureau, was referred to the Office of Professional Responsibility following Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s December 2019 report on the Trump-Russia investigation and its use of FISA surveillance against Trump campaign associate Carter Page. Shortly after the referral, Auten was involved with the bureau’s inquiry into the son of now-President Joe Biden, with his Aug. 2020 analysis being used in part to justify the decision to "shut down investigative activity."

 

Horowitz’s report undermined British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s dossier claims, and the watchdog criticized the DOJ and the FBI for at least 17 “significant errors and omissions” related to the FISA warrants against Page and for the bureau's “central and essential” reliance on Steele’s dossier. The DOJ watchdog said FBI interviews with Steele’s alleged main source, Igor Danchenko, "raised significant questions about the reliability" of the dossier.

 

Danchenko, a Russian-born lawyer, was charged with five counts of making false statements to the FBI. Auten was involved in analyzing the dossier, reviewed the Page FISAs in 2016 and 2017, and was among the FBI employees who interviewed Danchenko in January 2017, when the Russian undercut collusion claims. Horowitz indicated Auten did not pass along the fact that Danchenko had undermined the dossier when the FBI analyst circulated an intelligence memo on the dossier source in February 2017.

 

“The failures highlighted in that report are unacceptable — period,” Wray told the House in February 2020 when discussing Horowitz’s findings, adding that “where there are people who are still left, most of whom are effectively at the line level or at least were at the time of the inspector general report, they’ve been referred to our Office of Professional Responsibility, which is our disciplinary arm.”

 

Wray said at the time that everyone named in the report was referred to that office and called that body “one of the premier independent disciplinary arms in any executive agency.” He added that “if that process results in recommendations of discipline, then we’re going to impose discipline.” He has repeatedly echoed that he found the revelations in the Horowitz report “unacceptable” since then.

 

The FBI director added during the hearing that most of the high-level officials named in the report (such as fired FBI Director James Comey, fired deputy director Andrew McCabe, and fired agent Peter Strzok) were gone from the bureau. He also said at least some of the Page surveillance was likely illegal.

 

Wray noted that “there is an ongoing investigation by Mr. Durham, with which we’re actively cooperating and fully cooperating.” ..

Anonymous ID: 8a382e July 30, 2022, 5:25 a.m. No.16937234   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://sharylattkisson.com/2022/07/the-most-ceos-are-leaving-their-posts-at-us-companies-in-at-least-20-yrs/

 

More CEOs have left their posts the first 6 months of 2022 than during any comparable period in at least 20 years.

 

That's according to the firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.

 

The company says 774 CEOs have left their posts, up 20% from the 591 in the first half of last year.

 

The previous high was 728 exits announced in the first six months of 2006.

 

The following is an excerpt from Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.

 

The number of CEO changes at U.S. companies fell 29% to 106 in June from 150 in May. It is 2% higher than the 104 CEO changes announced in the same month in 2021, according to a report released Wednesday by global outplacement and business and executive coaching firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc.

Exits Rise Year Over Year

 

In the second quarter, CEO exits hit 379, up 13% from the 336 exits announced in the second quarter of 2021 and down 4% from the 395 CEO changes announced in the previous quarter.

 

So far this year, 774 CEOs have left their posts, the highest first half total since the firm began tracking monthly CEO changes in 2002. It is up 20% from the 591 CEO exits announced through June last year, and up 6% from the previous high of 728 exits announced in the first six months of 2006. ..