Anonymous ID: 584ae9 July 30, 2022, 12:52 p.m. No.16938510   🗄️.is 🔗kun

It's OK for Anons to 'pray' to a singular unified logic. Here's Anon's:

 

I pray for Kari Lake to become elected Governor of AZ, in addition to all the reasons leading up to election day, it is also so that Kari Lake can become a future President of the United States, and so becoming, would become the first President in history to be someone who, informationally, by information symmetry, would be the first 'voice' that was 'birthed' from within a narrative reality of knowing the Great Awakening information that was was itself birthed by Questioning EVERYTHING about our world, which also and must for consistency include a questioning of the self that circulates an entire lifetime of 'ingested' information designed to turn this body against my fellow God's creations.

 

Kari Lake would be the first 'Questioning President' who was elected by the exact same information asymmetry of unified logic as ABOVE all animals and things, where all ofus extend from that same unified source of it all.

 

Give it any name we want.

 

Even if this Anon tries to 'negate' it, and believe self as ontological capable, let alone self-persuaded of standing on a 'real' epistemological ground that includes all my fellow creations, this me, this self, self-knowingly cannot be consistent if my internal thoughts of whatever pattern of FUTURE information objects from me that arises out of THAT implementation, if that arises in my mind because of a peculiar ordering in the sequence of concatenating objects of information being produced by self advertised 'if you don't trust this source then you are wrong prior to you even interfacing with the people behind this source' guilt pattern of 'prior' information that gets ahead of every consciousness in the world where every other consciousness now has to change its own destiny to have to SPEND TIME creating 'counter' information objects that must consist of 'here's how I'm innocent', where if that information ISN'T forthcoming, that the 'prior' information somehow 'stands as truth' despite itself never being truly questioned under a light of reciprocal mutual awareness of each other's existence as justified PRIOR to ANY OF US engaging with each other.

 

Kari Lake would be a 'carrier' of SAME light that shines with the light of every sun in the universe, as we are all children of suns.

 

Sounds of words for some things, if they extend from the same unified source, will connect with other 'thoughts' that result when we question ourselves as to what another consciousness might be self experiencing when they produce the sound 'sun'.

Honesty would at least require a Question to that mind, and any information with a pattern of 'you are guilty if your thought patterns merely 'differ' from the 'prior' information of guilt pre engagement.

 

Why does the information even have so much pattern of 'pro and anti' 'approved' methodologies of engagement, which requires consciousnesses to deviate from their destined path in a world of consistency as a virtue again?

Without consistency, a whole system can crash no matter how big and complex, and truth be told the more large and complex a system is, the more consistent it must become lest that system destroy everything in a ritual devotion to death as a goal.

Enos AND Thanatos?

Enos OR Thanatos?

Is Thanatos real or is just the thought real and that can completely dominate bodies because those bodies were intentionally 'divided from' a system flooding reality with 'this system is divided from the whole system and is now the only system'.

 

Reinputting that logic into any complex formal system that is, perhaps only mistakenly thought to be, never 'objectively what is', precisely because this system NEEDS US ALL, and the more consciousnesses that can engage the BIGGER THE AND MORE POWERFUL THE COMPLEX FORMAL SYSTEM BECOMES?

 

When a unified source code logic is the BENCHMARK, amazing things can happen and it does not even require anyone to have to 'defend' a view to explain why they are saying what they are saying? Anon is not COMPLETELY in control of Anon's body.

Where does Anon mind place informational trust?

In what Anon would have to then output as 'KNOWING' inconsistencies to other consciousnesses (deception)?

Logically Anon cannot see any other 'real' path of body self control KNOWING that all other human beings extend from the same source as this Anon?

What may be a 'simple' 'small' pattern, can change everything that extends from that new human logic, where we all are identically extended logically into human as human consciousnesses.

Division PRE ENGAGEMENT is information this Anon may hear, but will never trust for own system if this system is to continue on and not crash because of turning the world into 'them against us'.

 

If a future President is informationally consistent with unified logic, which we SAW HABBEN ONCE, what can happen if every 'elected' institution worldwide was self presenting as also unified with 'us'?

Anonymous ID: 584ae9 July 30, 2022, 2:31 p.m. No.16938812   🗄️.is 🔗kun

It's because of the reality of temporal logic that unites us all that Questioning had to become .self(knowned) as an ontological real object through 'beeing seen' as real information objects that the total language could begin to talk about itself through and endless dictionary of Additions being the really real universal conjunctions to all information objects provided by as many consciousnesses as there are H[oo]man beings (what an interestingly uniting series of concatenated infinitely translationalable objects as can be outputted by every consciousness it is always good to have more consciousnesses as possible to make the totality bigger and able to expand itself from 'knowing' inconsistencies in the great all of all of all of …add more it's all real.

Anonymous ID: 584ae9 July 30, 2022, 2:36 p.m. No.16938830   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8885

And then all the reals, whatever happens next it is good for all to be all to be all as every one instance is made in higher than any one mind can have as really known which is mutual reciprocal self awareness of what is known as known in addition to what is said as is known, infinity…

Anonymous ID: 584ae9 July 30, 2022, 2:47 p.m. No.16938885   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>16938830

One possible axiom for consistent whole:

 

It is possible to introduce new information objects that carry with it as mutually agreed new and independent introduction of new information that within the totality of logical extensions from that permission thereby add new objects inconsistent with the 'outwardly' here's how 'this' source is to be understood…

 

Anon adds and add to each and include logic of at least on or, and out of the whole we can hope to see every real one as one and as and nit just but or ir or or or or or or……………..