DJT: "Fear not" July 31, 2022

ONE DAY DELTA LATER…

Q: "Fear not" Aug 1, 2018

What happens when you are a THREAT to the MSM/OLD GUARD?twitter.com/NBCNews/status/102

Coincidence?

Threats/scare tactics deployed.

Fear not.

Q

Hmmmm…Q seemed to described this 'story' as a 'threat'…

Anon opine on decode:

"Data breach" was true, but the INTENT of the story was to OPENLY 'THREATEN' the Q team and the public with "We will sell this data to the highest bidder, and they in turn may use it to inform MS-13 of a 'belligerent's' whereabouts, so stop the great awakening now or else we will DOX our own users…and use their bodies to 'punish' God and prove to the Q team and the public that they had better stop awakening?

https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/1024747172829556741

>>16945656

Satanists trying to divide Jews and Christians AGAIN.

>>16945686

>>16945710

The unsolicited "anti-P=Payseur" shills are one of the easiest to decode.

You can't possibly directly contradict Q after being provided with evidence and expect to 'blend in'.

Look at the sentence fragment "by way of one example".

Do you honestly believe it makes sense for Q to be saying BOTH that Pelosi is but one example among many, AND that Pelosi is managing to be the House Speaker giving interviews almost every day, AND is the secret figurehead leader of a globalist network of satanic pedophiles that spans the UN, central banks, and what else knows what, while she's getting drunk and feeding her husband insider information from her own involvement in pending legislation impacting company stock prices.

>>16945720

That video was actually very similar in 'tone', meaning absence of invading and killing, as a 'Dept of Defense' tone in displaying STRENGTH.

Not in a hostile 'we're coming for your, but a 'look at this awesome military force'.

Anon comfy because Soros said Xi is world enemy #1.

Logic.

If the author of the red text shill won't acknowledge that Anons know that the ultimate purpose of it is to 'compel' a repeating looping of 'tension' logic sourced sentence formation in the minds of Anons to be thought of 'thinking of Anon self', to psychologically disturb what is by the INTENT OF THE SITE to be about Questioning all conclusions made about people pre-engagement, if the red text shill won't acknowledge that this is what is known about the INTENT of it, after being provided with that information, logically must be considered a knowing 'attack' AGAINST RESEARCHING INFORMATION MORE THAN ABOUT ONE INDIVIDUAL'S 'INNER TENSIONS'.

>>16945877

What would be reason why there would be a knowing push for Anons, prior to ENGAGING WITH THE SOURCE DIRECTLY, why should those minds be shaped to ingest an 'inward conflict' narrative?

If Anons already know the psyop can have the size and scope of world wars as information extremism from 'thought' to reality, it's easy to see the mosquito logic extensions of the same source as the one the mosquito is trying to drink the blood of a host?

Indiscriminate attacks on Anon psychology?

Attacks…

On what is being generated ANONYMOUSLY.

When a mind sees attacks against anonymously sourced info…

Which is by the way the exact form that directly preceded the UN into announcing an informational war on the definition of definitions of words and meanings…(by virtue of their 'counter' move the UN just admitted to the world that it isn't even a real military, but a military sized protection force of the global satanic cult.

The UN is the cult's military-industrial complex force.

UN whistleblower: 60,000 rapes in 10 years worldwide, 3,300 pedophiles IN ACTION.

The UN is now in the informational war in a form that has them on a GIGANTIC DISADVANTAGE.

The shape of the chessboard is:

"Satanic cult OR 'we are not a satanic cult and we are going to instantly align ourselves with Soros and Rothschild (and Israel but that was asinine to 'include' AFTER YEARS OF HOSTILITY TOWARDS ISRAEL IN EVERY UN RESOLUTION CONSTANTLY MUH ISRAEL THIS AND THAT.

Remember Q+ called this out with 'the squad' publicly saying negative statements about the Israeli people?

To 'guide' the public into a 'reactionary' hostile pre engagement approach?

Now the UN is including 'Israel'?

As a HOSTAGE PERHAPS?

GO AGAINST US AND 'YOUR GOD' WILL LAUNCH ANOTHER 'DIVIDE YOURSELVES BY RELIGION' ATTACK ON A PEOPLE WHO ARE UNITED WITH HUMANITY?

How can the UN make any sense as a credible 'defender' of Israel, after YEARS OF NAKED AGGRESSION TO THE COUNTRY OF ISRAEL?

Former US ambassador to UN.

>>16945960

>books will be written

Yeah but you need to start consciously avoiding being the punchline at the arrogant 'momentum' from legacy information logics.

Kek