Anon has seen a lot of evidence on September 11th posted online over the years. Just the sheer number of different theories is a problem because it can be very confusing trying to integrate all the different opinions and angles into a single cohesive model of what one would believe happened that day. And why it happened, and so forth. Anon finds this regrettable because it is probably a fact that the bigger the haystack, the harder it is to find that needle and solve the crime for the public at large. Anon has entertained a number of different ideas and concepts on the subject. Anon's beliefs about September 11th have changed and evolved over the years. Anon keeps an open mind to new information. Or even old information that might be interpreted in a new way.
With all that said anon wants to say two things. (have much moar to say but will spare you the aggravation of a wall of text)
One: Anon remembers, about 15 years ago, reports about that jet engine found laying in the street. Anon read statement from purported jet engine expert that the engine found was the wrong engine (could not have been installed on 767s). He was pointing out parts in photos and saying this pump, or this feature on the front of the engine shows it is the wrong model of engine. That one really got my attention. But I don't really hear much about it anymore and don't know why.
Two: I've tried to put together multiple differing scenarios and tried to think them through as best I can. There is always a flaw or something that doesn't fit, or is incomplete. Very frustrating. At this time the most solid belief that I have out of all of this is that NYC & DC, although they were reported as near identical attack profiles, are different. Coordinated? Certainly. But I'm pretty convinced that the actual damage in NYC and the damage done in DC and Pennsylvania were accomplished in much different ways.