>>16980608

>There is ALWAYS ONE true SOURCE (that we can understand as a set of information) for why an event occurred. Multiple views of what took place do not logically refute the existence of the singular what that did in fact take place.

>A reciprocal interface WOULD appear as unified logic that does not divide itself from that which interfaces with it.

Huh? Is this code? Or a completely different side of Gen Flynn we haven't seen yet?

>>16980679

NOTABLE

ARCHIVED TO READ LATER, ALWAYS WORTH LISTENING TO VIGANIO==

>>16980781

I think you should consider reaching out to those who love you and want the best for you even if you can't (for whatever reason) provide the best for them. They still love you.