>Separation of Church and State doesn't mean anything, Constitutionally.
It means the state will not establish a religion.
>Only reference to that sentence fragment is in a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association who had written President Jefferson that they felt the state of Connecticut viewed their right to practice their faith as a "state given right". Jefferson replied in a general response that there should always be a "wall of separation between church and state".
Absolutely right because Jefferson wasn't your typical religi-cuck as was mainstream during his time.
>Like Roe, and everything else these filth lie about, there is no truth to anything they claim is in the Constitution. Because it simply isn't in there.
Since your are so passionate about redefining the defined for the sake of whatever argument it is you are trying to make, I'll ask:
What religion do you prefer to make the official state one since you're so opposed to the idea conveyed behind the Constitutionally backed phrase "Separation Of Church And State"?