That's fucking funny.
https://nypost.com/2017/05/12/cop-i-was-taunted-after-genetic-test-revealed-i-am-part-black/
-
SHOULD HAVE NEVER TOLD ANYONE ABOUT YOUR GENETIC RESULTS.
-
SHOULD HAVE PLAYED THE JOKE DOWN LIKE A MAN.
-
NOW THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS YOU'RE A SISSY PART NIGGER FAGGOT.
An important realisation:
You and your people do not have any sustainable rights, or sustainable self-determination, while governed by an ideology or reality that allows others, not you, or of your people, to settle amongst your people in great number. Or where your people do not possess a sustainable super majority & are not to be returned to it (in that space or any subset of it or alternative to it).
If a people are ruled by a large mass of people living distant from them (another city/state/nation), or from different people (racially, culturally, religiously) imported to their city/state/nation, there is no self-rule and self-determination realisable for those who were on the receiving end, until such happenstance is reversed.
If what happens in your town, is determined by people geographically distant to you, or culturally, religiously or racially non-aligned to you, and those like you, you do not possess self-determination. You are not self-ruling. You are being ruled.
People not like you, are making the rules you must live by. They are making the rules to suit themselves, not you, and not those like you.
This is the inexorable reality of what is. At odds with anti-racism and a happy future where (we all rule together as one), but totally in line with reality, and the wisdom of our elders, and the founders of our nations.
People don't want us to understand the above, because it prevents people having power over others distant to them. Because realising the above lets us KEEP our power, regain it and retain it. Retain our RIGHTS.
So it is labelled hate, and something that has to be worked against because it is 'racist'.
We need to be wiser than that. Self-rule is only possible where a group is in power, not ruled by others who are not them, or not of them, or not of their people, or their culture and civilisation.
Review any revolution in history or fight for freedom. It verifies the above. Only where it is like ruling like, that determination is upheld.
If your people are 5 votes amongst 15, to determine what happens in your own land and space, you do not possess self-determination. You are being ruled, no matter what skin of democracy and explanation is layered on top.
Each having their own space is not hatred. Denying a people a right to keep such a space is.
lb notable >>17012705
QClock June 28, 2022
DECLAS, Lisa Page & [a] v [e], [JC], Mueller, VERY senior member
Q1559 (:14 - 180MIRROR)
DECLAS
LP “Viva Le Resistance.”
Viv[a] vs Viv[e]
[J C]
Why classified by intel comm @ highest level?
Define title.
Define role w/ Mueller.
Exchange shelters VERY senior member.
Q
possible link to Q3575 @ :44
/deC/
Q
Yes. That is the Darkness -→ to light.
Destruction + Outrageous stupidity.
Precipice-Will to Change.
Look at how dumb they are, it really did have to be this way.
where's the header. no date
John J. Loud
On October 30, 1888, the first ballpoint pen or we have commonly known as ball pen or pen was patented in the United States of America with US patent #217576. John J. Loud from Massachusetts is the inventor of the first ballpoint pen. According to some sources, he was trying to invent a pen that can write on leather and on rough surfaces, then he comes up with the ball “tipped” pen.
https://theballpointpens.com/who-invented-the-ballpoint-pen/
László Bíró patented what is considered the first ballpoint pen in 1938, though he had been developing it for almost a decade beforehand with his brother György.
In 1931, they launched their ballpoint pen at the Budapest International Fair. Seven years later, in 1938, the Bíró brothers obtained patents in Britain and France and went to work to start selling their new ballpoint.
https://www.dayspringpens.com/blogs/the-jotted-line/who-invented-the-ballpoint-pen-history