Anonymous ID: c35ce8 Aug. 4, 2022, 12:25 p.m. No.17026375   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6403 >>6548 >>6671 >>6826 >>7459

To Ultra Conceited Anon who dared tell anons what to do:

Anon been posting Q right and left. The norms seem much more willing to consider it now.

They already thought anon was crazy so what can a little more hurt? That said, they are beginning to think maybe I is not as crazy as they thought.

Anonymous ID: c35ce8 Aug. 4, 2022, 12:28 p.m. No.17026723   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7041 >>7048 >>7064

>>17026467

holy sheeit, do not donate to these chancers, looks like a massive grift charlie ward style. extract below.

=

Content Creators

The following citations are not necessarily an indication of purposeful collaboration. Rather, we are merely giving credit to the works of others that are featured somewhere in this website. They appear in no specific order. The links will bring you to their respective channel where you will find more quality relevant content.

Anonymous ID: c35ce8 Aug. 4, 2022, 12:30 p.m. No.17026980   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7453

>>17026380

…part two

With breathtaking cynicism, the relentlessly anti-free speech SPLC based its defense on the First Amendment, and Coral Ridge’s complaint was dismissed on free speech grounds. Thomas explained: “Because Coral Ridge conceded that it was a ‘public figure,’ the court observed that Coral Ridge had to prove three elements to rebut SPLC’s First Amendment defense: the ‘hate group’ designation had to be (1) provably false, (2) actually false, and (3) made with ‘actual malice.’” This makes the SPLC’s defamation virtually immune to challenge: “The court concluded that SPLC’s ‘hate group’ designation was not provably false because ‘“hate group” has a highly debatable and ambiguous meaning.’”

 

What’s more, the court said that Coral Ridge hadn’t proved that the SPLC acted with “actual malice,” as is required by the 1964 case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. Thomas explained that in a defamation case, while an individual need prove only that the defamation has subjected him to “hatred, contempt, or ridicule,” a “public figure” must prove “actual malice,” that is, that the defamatory statement was made “with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.”

 

Thomas said rightly that this standard should be reconsidered, as it allows for all manner of defamation, including but by no means limited to what is published by the SPLC. The Justice pointed out that “this case is one of many showing how New York Times and its progeny have allowed media organizations and interest groups ‘to cast false aspersions on public figures with near impunity.’” Indeed. But the SPLC has hundreds of millions of dollars, and in my personal experience, lawyers are afraid to take it on.

 

Yet as Thomas notes, “SPLC’s ‘hate group’ designation lumped Coral Ridge’s Christian ministry with groups like the Ku Klux Klan and Neo-Nazis. It placed Coral Ridge on an interactive, online ‘Hate Map’ and caused Coral Ridge concrete financial injury by excluding it from the AmazonSmile donation program.” Nor is Coral Ridge alone. But “nonetheless, unable to satisfy the ‘almost impossible’ actual-malice standard this Court has imposed, Coral Ridge could not hold SPLC to account for what it maintains is a blatant falsehood.”

 

Thomas is right. The Supreme Court “should not ‘insulate those who perpetrate lies from traditional remedies like libel suits.’” Unless and until New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and the SPLC are taken down, conservatives will increasingly be second-class citizens in the United States.

Anonymous ID: c35ce8 Aug. 4, 2022, 12:30 p.m. No.17027030   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Just some gun, crime and population musings:

 

81.4 Million Gun Owners In The US:

https://americangunfacts.com/gun-ownership-statistics/

 

Guns used defensively btwn 500K - 3Mx per year:

https://www.heritage.org/firearms/commentary/why-these-defensive-uses-firearms-should-disarm-second-amendment-skeptics

 

Population 330M. Under 18 22%. Therefore adults = 257.4M

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045221

 

So, on the low end: 81M divided by 500K is .6% of gun owners using a gun annually for defensive reasons. So, in a 10 year time frame, you've cycled through 6% of gun owners; which are really only 30% of the adult population (approx).

 

Presumably, if the other 17M adults owned a gun, it would stand to reason that guns could be used defensively another 1.5M times (at the low end) and on the high end 9M+ times per year on the high end.

Anonymous ID: c35ce8 Aug. 4, 2022, 12:36 p.m. No.17027691   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17027110

>Hunters hookers

 

Q, where are the children?

Seriously. Where are the children?

 

3,000+ saved by the raids in SA alone.

WW lanes shut down.

Bottom to TOP.

[HAITI].

[RED CROSS]

[CLASSIFIED]

High Priority.

Q

 

392

Dec 19, 2017 8:50:59 PM EST

Q !UW.yye1fxo

Anonymous ID: c35ce8 Aug. 4, 2022, 12:37 p.m. No.17027716   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://nypost.com/2022/06/02/biden-sanctions-putin-yachts-on-99th-day-of-ukraine-war/

Joe Biden sanctions Vladimir Putin yachts on 99th day of Ukraine war

President Biden unveiled new sanctions Thursday targeting influential Russians and President Vladimir Putin’s yachts on the 99th day of Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine — but two oligarchs linked to his son Hunter Biden again were spared.

It remains unclear why Hunter Biden’s alleged Russian business associates — the billionaire oligarchs Yelena Baturina and Vladimir Yevtushenko — eluded the latest round of US sanctions against members of Russia’s business elite. Baturina, whose wealth derives largely from construction, in 2014 paid a firm associated with Hunter Biden $3.5 million, according to a 2020 report written by Republican-led Senate committees. She is the widow of former Moscow mayor Yury Luzhkov, and documents from Hunter Biden’s laptop indicate she may have attended a 2015 dinner in DC with then-Vice President Joe Biden. Yevtushenkov, who owns a nearly 50% stake in Russian conglomerate Sistema — which has telecom, retail, banking, food and health interests — faces UK sanctions over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but hasn’t yet been targeted by the Biden administration. He met with Hunter Biden in 2012 at Moscow’s Ritz-Carlton hotel, but recently claimed they had no subsequent contact.