she getting a bit of weight on.
Archive finding confirms view of Russians on NATO eastward expansion
Published 18.02.2022
"We have made it clear that we will not extend NATO beyond the Elbe," German diplomat Juergen Chrobog wrote of a March 1991 meeting of the United States, Britain, France, and Germany. This document confirms the Russian view on eastward expansion.
Advertisement
A note from the British National Archives that has only now surfaced supports the Russian claim that the West violated pledges made in 1990 with NATO's eastward expansion. This is reported by "Der Spiegel."
U.S. political scientist Joshua Shifrinson found the formerly classified document. It deals with a March 6, 1991, meeting in Bonn of the political directors of the foreign ministries of the U.S., Britain, France and Germany. The topic was the security of Poland and other Eastern European states. A Political Director heads the Political Division in the State Department and is considered the closest advisor to the Secretary of State.
Bonn's representative, Jürgen Chrobog, stated at the time, according to the memo, "We made it clear in the Two Plus Four negotiations that we would not extend NATO beyond the Elbe. We therefore cannot offer NATO membership to Poland and the others."
The British, French and Americans also rejected NATO membership for the Eastern Europeans. U.S. Representative Raymond Seitz said, "We have made it clear to the Soviet Union - at Two Plus Four as well as other talks - that we will take no advantage of Soviet troop withdrawals from Eastern Europe." Two years later, the Americans corrected their policy.
https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article236986765/Nato-Osterweiterung-Archivfund-bestaetigt-Sicht-der-Russen.html
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
"We are the News": Eight tips for better notable posts
-
Remember journalism's five "W"s: Who, What, When, Where, Why/hoW.
These are reporting basics. For us, DATES are critical; always include.
-
"Use your words" (not just images) for Q proofs, etc.
If you can't describe it, how is baker supposed to?
Text is important. People searching for your info in qresear.ch can only search on text.
-
Use RED TEXT & bold to call out notables.
This REALLY helps bakers locate notables & avoid eye strain.
Always spell out the word 'notable'. This is critical to help the anons who use the Bakertools javascript; they can just navigate right through the notables IF the word is spelled correctly.
-
Include article and video TITLES, not just links.
Sauce on vids is usually sparse; try to include a date plus a short abstract.
-
For tweets, copypasta the text too, so the info gets into qresear.ch
Qresear.ch is a great resource, but it's 100% text.
-
DATES, DATES, DATES.
Shills post old but jazzy news on purpose, then say 'clown baker' if notabled. Defeat this with dates.
-
If post is part of an ongoing dig, say the DIG name so it's gets notabled.
Don't assume the baker knows. An individual baker is not here 24/7 and they may not know.
-
Only got JPEGS on your Apple phone? Then use text instead (links, title, date).
-
Go to step 1. Wash, rinse, repeat!