I mean after all, if the FVEY controllers believe it's OK to spy on the world, then it should also be AT LEAST ok for the data on the events associated to those actions to become open source and 'known' by those spied on.
If it's wrong for those spied on to complain or if there is asserted no good reason why those spied on should know details of who is spying on them, then surely there can't be anything universally wrong with the data of THAT to be open source.
It would be opposite to common sense to behave with an NWO API that outputs inconsistencies by design: {"Colluding with Russia oligarchs/spies to steal (2016) election is bad", "Colluding with Russia oligarchs/spies to steal (2020) election is good"}
Q is successfully, step-wise building a series of object proofs that ARE INCLUDED IN THE HISTORICAL RECORD.
"Record books"