WHERE IS MY GIRLFRIEND?
https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/johnson:-ukrainians-who-come-to-uk-illegally-could-be-sent-t
Johnson: Ukrainians who come to UK illegally could be sent to Rwanda
In an escalation of his government's plans to deport those crossing into the UK to seek sanctuary, PM Boris Johnson has said that Ukrainian refugees entering the UK without authorization may be deported to Rwanda.
Johnson defended, on Thursday, his contentious deal to deport migrants to Rwanda, urging critics to "keep an open mind."
It is worth noting that the London-Kigali scheme, which involves Britain deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda thousands of miles away, has sparked outrage.
The migrant arrangement has been strongly condemned by rights groups, church leaders, and the United Nations, not to mention that it threatens to overshadow this week's Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM).
One of the most outspoken opponents is the British heir to the throne, Prince Charles, who has been quoted in the British media as calling it "appalling".
Johnson had previously said the prospect of Ukrainian refugees being sent to Rwanda was "simply not going to happen."
However, when asked ahead of the CHOGM meeting on whether Ukrainians arriving to the UK by boat may be deported to East Africa, he said: “The only circumstances in which people will be sent to Rwanda would be if they come to the UK illegally," adding moments later "if you come here illegally, you’re undermining all those who come here legally. And it’s crazy. So I’m afraid the answer is I suppose, yes, in theory that could happen. But I think it’s very unlikely.”
UK and Ukrainian refugees
Critics of the UK government's response to the war have said that the UK in fact takes in fewer Ukrainians per capita than most of Europe.
“In stark contrast to the British public who have opened their doors to welcome Ukrainians in desperate search of safety, our prime minister has confirmed that the government is intent on treating them as human cargo to be transported from the UK to Rwanda," Enver Solomon, the chief executive of the Refugee Council said regarding Johnson's statements.
The first flight carrying migrants was scheduled for June 14, following the rejection of a lawsuit filed by human rights activists seeking to halt the government's decision to send illegal migrants to Rwanda. According to the court's statement, the flight was canceled after the ECHR ruled that an Iraqi migrant involved might face "a real risk of irreversible harm."
Rwanda's government announced that it has already begun spending the 120 million pound downpayment given by the UK on the asylum scheme, as the government's spokesperson said that part of it was spent to prepare accommodations to receive the first batch of migrants that was supposed to arrive on the 14th.
Meanwhile, to counter the EHCR's decision, Britain began legislating for a new bill of rights on Wednesday, which would state unequivocally that Britain's Supreme Court, which approved the Rwanda flights, had legal supremacy and that ECHR judgments did not necessarily have to be followed by British courts.
According to the Ministry of Justice, it would certify that injunctions ordered by the ECHR under Rule 39, which halted the Rwandan flight, were not binding.
Stephanie Boyce, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, said it would create an acceptable class of human rights violations, while Sacha Deshmukh, Chief Executive of Amnesty International UK, said it was unsurprising that politicians held accountable by human rights laws wanted them removed.
"This is not about tinkering with rights. It's about removing them," Deshmukh said.
Two, the media wants it to go on forever because it feeds their bias, and it feels like they're reporting something when they're just Democrat stenographers. Here's one tweet from ABC's Jonathan Karl. It just says, "Thank you. Cassidy Hutchinson." That's a reporter. I guess he's referring to her testimony, but who knows? Maybe she shared her Netflix password with him, but that's the media. I'm just happy they left their pompoms at home.
Three, the Dems are in control, at least until November. This propaganda machine can go on till then, so don't be surprised if it does, because, like Joe on the steps of Air Force One, there's just no balance. Without legit pushback, you see, the Democrat politics is actually Stalinist politics, show me The Donald and I'll show you the crime.
So one wonders, what's really worse, that a rally got out of hand for one day, a rally in which people who never broke the law before broke the law, then got arrested and are serving time, which they should, because they broke the law or an open-ended one party media protected tribunal paid for by you to save their party's chances in November, while persecuting anyone they can in this unfettered witch hunt. Well, the answer is easier than me, after three daiquiris or two, eh one.
Meanwhile, our government ignores people illegally intimidating Supreme Court justices. How's that? So is this America where they offer unsubstantiated allegations that fall apart like a slow cooked pork shoulder, then use that to compel more testimony, testimony by reluctant participants, in front of grim partisan hacks?
We now see how duped everyone is to fall for the insurrection lie. It was all to create a spectacle to divert from their failures. So if you bought this B.S., you got Cheney'd, and you thought her dad only shot friends in the face. She contributed to a show trial that would make Joe McCarthy blush.
Did you see right after testifying, the star witness rushed to embrace Liz? What's that mean? Are they old friends? No, they're just part of the play. They're hugging like cast members of SNL when the show's over. How would Liz Cheney even know this low level executive branch employee? Unless, of course, they met at rehearsal.
So what's this mean for you? That you got to vote. The only way to stop this, is to vote every —- brained Democrat out of office. And then, and then let the real hearings begin. Because now we have the smoking gun, the laptop, the messages, the big man admitting he knew what his corrupt son was up to, roll the voicemail.
JOE BIDEN'S 2018 VOICEMAIL ON HUNTER'S CHINA DEAL: If you get a chance, give me a call. Nothing urgent. I just wanted to talk to you. I thought the article released online, it's going to be printed tomorow in the Times, was good. I think you're clear.
JOE BIDEN SKIT: "I think you're clear." Talk about real first person evidence of all sorts of multiple felonies, right on tape, which was buried by the press. Compare that to this show trial, full of mind reading and hearsay that's amplified by the press. It's crazy. I just hope there are more, there are more phone messages from Joe to Hunter.
JOE BIDEN SKIT: Hey, pal, it's dad again. I was just thinking, you know that, the voicemail I left you, the one about the, 'you're all clear.' You know to delete that, right? Okay, yeah, you're a smart kid. Alright, and just call me big guy from now on. Alright? No one's going to know what that means. Alright, love you, bye.
No wait, I think there's one more, right?
JOE BIDEN SKIT: Hey pal, its dad again? Hey look, I was just thinking. While we're deleting things… I was thinking maybe the 1,400 videos of you with the hookers and the cocaine? Yeah, I think you can get rid of those. I know it's, it's fun to look back, but I think it's time we give those the old 'scrubba dub.' Alright? Alright, love you.
The old 'scrubba dub.'
This is going to be great because these people should pay for wasting our time with these hearings while ignoring crime, inflation, border atrocities. It's our turn for justice, and I'm going to be here for it. Not because I'm a journalist, not because I'm a Republican, pretty sure I'm neither. It's because I'm an American, a pissed off one, too, and you should be as well.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/greg-gutfeld-cassidy-hutchinson-testimony-ruined-january-6-committee
STFU Bastard!
anything notable?
or can we stipulate that there is only one notable before 155? no sense revisiting that which has gone before.
He watched the Matrix and Neo wasn't his hero, The machines were. He is not a human, he advocates for trans-humanism.
repooplickin party sends best Bidet stock photos
>>17039767
Jim takes the arrows for anons and wins!
He's a true fighter.
10-4