>>17039961
I HAVE AT LEAST A ZERO DELTA BUT NOT FULLY, WAY BETTER THAN YOUR WATKINS FAKE Q
BUT I DON'T NEED TO PROVE A Q TO PROVE YOUR FAKE WATKINS Q IS FAKE. HE ALREADY REVEALED HIMSELF TO BE EMOTIONALLY TRIGGERED BY ANTI-WATKINS TRUTH.
>>17039961
I HAVE AT LEAST A ZERO DELTA BUT NOT FULLY, WAY BETTER THAN YOUR WATKINS FAKE Q
BUT I DON'T NEED TO PROVE A Q TO PROVE YOUR FAKE WATKINS Q IS FAKE. HE ALREADY REVEALED HIMSELF TO BE EMOTIONALLY TRIGGERED BY ANTI-WATKINS TRUTH.