>thank you anon, you a real one
>no, that's not really implied at all. being locked out is not the same as being impersonated…
absolutely correct
>if anyone used Q's tripcode and Q returned, why wouldn't they explicitly state that the prior posts were fake?
it is referenced (tripcode no longer secure) but I agree, I would have liked it to be like 10x more explicitly stated
>do you see how the vagueness is in line with the other fake Q's vagueness?
I do
and I dont like it