Anonymous ID: cc2254 Aug. 5, 2022, 6:09 a.m. No.17064068   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4278 >>4409 >>4452

DJT: "Why donโ€™t the Unselects show this? Case over!"

 

They don't show it because then the J6 unselects will have to admit that [Twitter] used the same satanic inversion of dialectic as they did against Q+.

 

Falsely smearing a video EXPLICITLY CALLING FOR EVERYONE TO GO HOME IN PEACE as 'risking violence' is a satanic inversion of the DEFINITIONS of peace and of violence. Calling for peace is defined as violence and violence (their own in arresting those who dissent from their narrative) is defined as calling for peace.

 

They don't just use young bodies as proxy to fight against God. They will use the bodies of duly elected Presidents to project their Satanic inversions of definitions.

 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/108768759346924712

Anonymous ID: cc2254 Aug. 5, 2022, 6:14 a.m. No.17064081   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4115 >>4147

>>17064067

You are a sick bastard.

AJ was the source all you lying pieces of shit used to spread the lie that children were not killed at Sandy Hook, and yet even after AJ admitted under oath that he lied, even after he admitted children were killed, you fucking pieces of degenerate shit STILL push the same lie as if it now carries its own reality regardless of whether the source completely retracted himself.

THIS behavior of you fucking assholes is itself how 'the thought of Satan' is repeated on and on and on as if merely NOTIONING lies constitutes a reality of truth as it is.

Anonymous ID: cc2254 Aug. 5, 2022, 7:28 a.m. No.17064417   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4445

>>17064389

I never much liked the extreme denial of self logic.

For Anon asks, from what source are all Anons to understand as to be outputting that statement of denial of self?

Logically there is a self sourcing that statement because it is logically structured as a 'separately sourced' introduction of "a" claim to truth in the totality of reality.

And why 'five' misconceptions? That's driven by personality towards symbolism.