>>17070261

anons don't need a leader

anons also are united as fuck

the problem is organization

in order to move physically

(never in a bad way of course)

i think anons are capable of many things (maybe even free children)

but the organization has to be offline and super oldschool because you know why

>>17063223

There is also an accurate transcript to read linked in the noitables from last night. Not much to it. Still under a gag order.

Half is going off today. Gonna meme the libtards into snipping themselves.

This is too funny.