AJ is controlled opposition.
AJ played his part. Parkland was an op. My "source" is not and has never been AJ. Anons have always known what AJ was, only shills pushed his bullshit here.
To discredit the Truth, have controlled oppo like AJ add to it/push it.
It doesn't matter what AJ says. He was not the source of claiming it wasn't real. Like I said, to discredit truth, simply have controlled oppo like AJ add to it and push it. Just like AJ tried to do with Q.
It works perfectly on someone like you. You can't get past the either/or. You can't comprehend that parkland was an OP AND AJ is full of shit.
Parkland was an OP, AJ is controlled opposition, the court case was a show.
AJ is not and never was the source for believing it was fake. AJ was the controlled opposition added to discredit the parkland was an OP truth.
AJ isn't the source, why is that so hard for you to understand?
AJ is a textbook case of how to discredit truth. He pushes the truth as a conspiracy theory and adds to it, then "fails" and admits he was "wrong". Idiots like you fall for it and ignore the truth.
You're falsely accusing based on what you want to believe. I have never listened to AJ and he has never been my source of anything but laughing at him when I see clips here.
You're desperate to push the sandy hook truth as a discredited AJ claim.
No he's not, and no matter how many times you repeat that lie wont make it true. AJ is and always was controlled opposition meant to discredit those who seek Truth about sandy hook.
What makes you think you can say what my source is? AJ attached himself to it to discredit it, he was never the source.
This is your basic argument:
Man: "The sky is blue"
AJ: "The sky is blue because frogs are gay"
AJ: "I lied, the sky is red and frogs have nothing to do with it"
You: "See the sky isn't blue. Your source admitted he lied!!! Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!"
Anons here have always known what AJ was, and Q called him out quite quickly.
You're so desperate for that AJ is the source narrative to be true. Kek