James Patterson apologizes for saying white, male writers are facing 'racism'
Anon sees vicious logic from radical left RACIST thugs.
They are projecting a false logic that viciously denies and attackssimultaneous truthsfrom even being uttered.
It does NOT follow from the statement "white male writers face racism" that it 'minimizes', or 'trivializes' or 'is insensitive towards' or ANY OTHER NARRATIVE PREDICATED ON THE FALSE DIALECTIC OF ONE INFORMATION OBJECT PREVENTING ANOTHER TRUE INFORMATION OBJECT FROM BEING SPOKEN OR THOUGHT OF OR UTTERED.
It's as if the radical left who intimidated Patterson into silence believe that if they accept the truth that white male writers do in fact face racism, that somehow this 'NEGATES' or 'destroys' or 'denies' every racism against non white non male people.
The radical left's logic falls prey to treating what is in fact everywhere an 'AND' conjunction linking information objects, as if they were 'BUT' or 'CAN'T BE TRUE BECAUSE THERE IS ANOTHER SIMULTANEOUS TRUTH'.
The radical left is clearly displaying a pattern of belief that there is no space no room for CONCURRENT truths to even be spoken about in public, as if doing so is an act of destroying the information objects that they are the whole time having in their minds and spoken of.
They are falsely behaving as if there is no room, that adding more instances of racism somehow 'disproves' all other instances of racism, but there is room and one does not disprove another, they're all individual cases.
Patterson doesn't need to apologize and shouldn't have to apologize.
He only ADDED more information, there is no destruction of any other information by doing so.
Question Anon has is WHY does the radical left seem to want the narrative to only have specific information objects as even permitted? Why can't they just be content to introduce everything they can, and if there is other information objects there, so what?
https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/james-patterson-apologizes-saying-white-male-writers-are-facing-racism