>>17102736

There is left and right. They are biological evolved orientations that tend towards optimum overall growth when in ordered balance.

Leftism -we must change to overcome things that are bad

Rightism -we must be careful and discourage changes that may prove to do more harm than good.

1 part the first, to 5 parts the latter, and civilisation sifts through the worst ideas, while still progressing the best, at a pace that allows mistakes to be handled without them piling up.

We now, thanks to the media and past success (wealth) live in a society where they are structured more 1 to 1 in number, or 3 to 2 / 2 to 3 etc. Out of balance and so undergoing change out of control, without the sifting mechanism in proper orientation.

There are also different races.

Q downplays racial rights and interests either because he perceives it as being counter to immediate needs, or because he is not in fact, on our side.

It may be, that Q perceives the truth as too hard for most barely awake anons (those that stick with anti-racism) to get.

Racism is necessary for survival, but does not need to be pushed to outright harming and hatred of others to achieve this.

While anti-racism needs to be tempered by racism and some sense of self-preservation and need for self-referencing to ensure survival.

Hard to understand for a devoted anti-racist no?

But easy for a person who is racist (only because they can see the nature derived necessity of it without any trace of hate for others or wish to see others harmed).

There could also be 4 factions:

1. globalists that want elite control

2. globalists that want the mass of humanity to be in control (NECESSITATING the dispossession and loss of self-determination of the White race)

3. nationalists who want each race to have its own space & sustainable existence (the racist position)

4. nationalists who want their race to destroy and rule all others (possible another globalist position -1, or an uber racist-nationalist position).

I'm a 3. Q could be any of the positions. Not presenting himself as explicitly 3 because it requires too much nuance for most to understand, or because he doesn't agree and isn't a 3 at all.

4 and 1 would mean he isn't as he presents as and is working for the elite, which is always a possibility (no one should be blindly followed)..

..and if he is a 2, he ultimately is ok with a future that is explicitly harmful to White people (& genocidal).

So for me he HAS to be a 3 to be "good" and moral. But many in category 2 THINK they are moral, despite their vision/utopia being built upon the dispossession of others against their will.