>>1708220 (PREVIOUS BREAD)
> Anonymous ID: 90db37 No.350576 📁
> Feb 12 2018 10:46:03 (EST)
> >>350546
> Chris Wallace looks clean as far as those descriptors used by Q are concerned. Looking into Matthews now
> '
>Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 94b137 No.350607 📁
>Feb 12 2018 10:47:57 (EST)
>>>350576
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Wallace📁
>You are not looking close enough.
>Q
https://youtu.be/GG8SjeeV7Y4
https://youtu.be/GG8SjeeV7Y4
https://youtu.be/GG8SjeeV7Y4
<bMike Wallace = Dirty dirty </b><br>
If you haven't watched it yet, definitely see the documentary "The 60 Minutes Deception" about how Mike Wallace was full-on cabal controlled mouthpiece, running interference for the Clinton WH official narrative re: the Vince Foster… ahem… suicide. Lies, distortions, omissions, and outright slander of an investigative journalist in the service of selling the original "shut up about our Arkancide" media tactic. Once again, the Clintons wrote the book on coopting the media to spin lies so outrageous, most people never thought to even question them. The DS has been calling plays from that book ever since.
Thankfully we have the interwebz now - although, remarkably, that's not even enough for most people… as it seems we have to both lead the horse to water, AND pull its head out of its own ass to make it drink.
But, alas, this suffering renders our purpose for being, anons.