>>1709796 bread 2151

>>>Granted, it doesn't directly prove or debunk, but one of the prime arguments of the FE shills is that the planets are not real. This is what I am debunking, really, because it's too easy.

--

I disagree. You've only shown a flat disk of something. Why cling so tightly to Jesuit-inspired edumuhcation?

What's going on with the Nikon P900 footage of stars and planets?

What are those translucent orbs around the sun, visible during a solar eclipse and described in the book, Earth Not A Globe?

Why is every measurement of water flat?

Many unanswered questions with both models.