>can u just in laymans term explain what you are trying to prove.
the only way to actually verify Q is with a ZERO delta between Q's post and DJT
start with that logic framework
the Q post has to come FIRST inside the 60 second delta, and THEN the DJT post
so we know Q posted FIRST,
not just sitting around watching POTUS social and hit the reply button really quick when POTUS posts
then, anons take a CAP of both posts
the Q post
and the DJT social media post that is 0 delta with it
and make a proof
then, Q tags a "correct" PROOF to confirm that was actually the correct set of posts that were being called out
THAT is how you verify Q
and it does not require a tripcode
it DOES require pre-calling the shot
Q posts BEFORE POTUS
and hits a 0 DELTA
that is the BASIC first step
then
Q has "called a shot" for the SCOTUS opinion on WV v EPA, calling it as 5/4 in favor
this opinion has not been released yet
future will prove past
ergo
when that opinion is released
and WV vs EPA is actually decided on a 5/4 margin
that will be FINAL proof that the poster that did the above things isactuallyQ
and not some fake and gay imposter
find any faults in that logic?
any more questions?