I think it would have to be Secret Service not Mil.
strange wording I don't know what to make of it.
federal facility outside DOJ’s authority
non-DOJ federal entity
>>1713702 so both the entity and the facility are outside DOJ authority. It uses incarcerated so does that rule out some form of witness protection? a federal facility that is outside DOJ doesn't make sense to me
>>1713753 I thought Military prison at first but would not be called a Federal facility. It almost reads as if there is a prisoner somewhere that is not under the control of the prison and has guards of a different agency but the use of entity in place of agency throws that off. I'm clueless what this report is saying
what happened to his rush to make funeral plans? It seems the delays we experience of OIG report and DOJ documents has an effect on need for funeral plans also.