Huge Plot Twist Develops Immediately After DC Jury Acquits Perkins Coie Lawyer Michael Sussmann
Perkins Coie Has Been Doing Politically Targeted Spying of Democrat's Political Opponents Since 2012 - Facilitated By None Other Than The FBI
Well the jury wasn’t out all that long once it’s deliberations began anew on Tuesday, May 31st, following the Memorial Day holiday. After asking to see two of the government exhibits, the jury returned and found top DNC/Hillary Clinton power-lawyer Michael Sussmann not guilty of making a false statement to a federal official.
A lot of people - including me - had good reasons for expecting a conviction. Reasons such as that Durham had never lost a case in which he brought a defendant to trial, and the fact there was a literal mountain of evidence - including a text message he wrote himself and never denied writing - that showed Sussmann lied to FBI General Counsel James Baker about representing clients when he made his approach to the law enforcement agency with the Alfa Bank hoax.
On the other hand, there were those who insisted the amount of evidence didn’t matter because this was a Washington D.C. jury, and they were pulled from a political elitist population that believes Durham should have been ended long ago and this whole trial was a farce.
Turns out those who held that a DC jury was never going to convict a Democrat power lawyer were in fact correct about that. This is one of the most blatant examples of jury nullification I’ve ever witnesses, and that includes the OJ Simpson trial.
Did Anything Positive Come Out of the Sussmann Trial?
Yes, absolutely. If you followed the case from the beginning and saw the groundwork Durham and his prosecution team spent over 7 months preparing in the case filings, it became apparent that the Sussmann case was the jumping off point of prosecuting a criminal ‘joint venture’ involving dozens of different people spread out over various political campaigns, private firms and government agencies.
Just because on a single false statement charge that Durham used to establish all that groundwork, a DC jury nullified all the evidence and let Sussmann walk, does this also nullify the evidence that Durham now has on record with the court?
It does not. Durham can still use all this evidence in ongoing cases.
Let me count the ways.
Read further:
https://briancates.substack.com/p/huge-plot-twist-develops-immediately