… well, PT said they were very, very bad people. Kids aren't here.
My thoughts are in line with those of people charting millennia of successful existence.
Anti-racism is a last century invention, that since its adoption has led to the replacement and disempowerment of the groups that have embraced it.
Ergo, which is more likely - a person holding views in alignment with millennia of successful history and a direct link to survival, exhibiting a mental disorder, or the person going against the survival and rights of their own people, adopting a position that leads to their harm?
If a wolf in a pack, acted in a way that neglected a positive future for their wolf-pack, vis a vis one that continued to exhibit the pro-survival behaviours the pack depended upon, which would a biologist say was suffering from disordered behaviour?
And the one acting to pump up division here is you. There is nothing stopping two racists, of differing races working together to take down a force that threatens them both.
The only person imagining that into existence is you.
On the other hand, by disallowing racism as valid and desirable, you place your hand on the erasure of a people, and their dispossession, that NECESSITATES division. As per the other examples given.
Who was racist Anon? Our grandparents, great grandparents, great great grandparents…
Who i anti-racist Anon? The screaming childless banshees of the left, and milquetoast "conservatives" that allow their people to be replaced.
Our grandparents were aligned with the sustainable life of their people and civilisation, these others are not.
You are the one suffering under a mental disorder. Denialitis.