Anonymous ID: d0f6cf Aug. 7, 2022, 12:27 p.m. No.17159151   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17148997

>>17153130

By golly, I can't remember the last time I responded to a shill. But for ol' times sake.

1st

>legally

what? just because they didn't ID with an SS number, that's what counts in your book?

2

up until 1987 because of Roe v Wade there was some unintended side effects.

For all of history it was assumed that babies could feel pain. Duh right? Well after roe v wade, to help the rolling make sense, all the sudden the entirety of the medical industry stopped using anesthesia on infants, and in many cases any child under the age of 2 yrs old.