>>1719554 (lb)

This anon agrees (pic related)

>>1719704

It's not that simple. Those missiles don't just float out of that pig on their own.

>>1719745

Far more likely that is a photo of the interception of something. We did trials from surface ships.

>hacking an ohio class sub

No.

>>1719838

This seems correct.

>>1719823

I'm telling you, based on required human input, this is impossible.

>>1719878

I switched the explanations

737 seems correct

Hack is 100% not correct

>>1719914

I mixed that up. I agree it's the kentucky.

I was disagreeing with the theory that the sub got hacked. No chance.

Phone fagging, sorry

ANONS

You cannot "hack" a missile launch from an ohio class. It is impossible. It would take the entire crew having a mutiny to facilitate

737 missile intercepted something

>>1720158

Check my first post in this bread. It is impossible. Other operational requirements are necessary.

Cannot be hacked.

>>1720205

It's more complicated than that. But some good old fashion human shit needs to happen. Actually alot of human shit needs to happen. If you can believe it, it's kind of a pain in the ass to end the world

>>1720264

2 crews, 150 men each.

Yeah, no. The Kentucky are the good guys.

The hack theory is nonsense