>>1719002
>>1719025
>>1719028
>>1719043
>>1718985
The article states that “sensitive” information was taken from an unclassified Network. Navy considers anything that is not classified to be sensitive.
So the information stolen was unclassified. Not likely that unclassified could drive sub or fire missile.
Conflating program with computer software program. Those are not the same thing in Navy terms.
From the article.
“…former navy officer highlights the loss of cryptographic information used in submarine communications.”
No way cryptographic information (which is classified top secret) would be on an unclassified Network….unless it was hillary’s.
Read the details of the article. It states the information was sensitive.
Missile launch codes, jnstructions etc would be classified.
Classified information would not be on a non classified server….unless Hillary.
Need more logical thought on this.
While technically that would be true, in reality there wouldn’t be anything to
The codes wouldn’t have been on an unclassified server. The article is misleading and very inaccurate.
Where did the article say they broke into the launch computer?
It said sensitive, not classified. It wouldn’t be attached to the internet.