>>1720334
The article said they stole details to a new weapons system called "sea dragon" if this is an actual weapons system and not just a new missile then it could potentially have a whole host of new vulnerabilities that can be taken advantage of, possibly even allowing direct access to bypass interlocks. If a bad actor is able to get all the details regarding a program like this they WILL find the vulnerabilities.
Possible… an SM-6 Air-Air missile would be a helluva lot easier to launch surreptitiously than a nuke Trident.
Reverse image search. >>USS Kentucky ID'ed by anons
Think hack. >>system to issue authenticated launch orders hacked, orders issued to sub by bad actors
Comms dark. >>Ordered sub to shut down comms and proceed to launch depth for launch
Q
Sailor anon… if you were to receive authenticated orders to go comms dark and launch would you not launch??
Its exactly the same as when the avionics companies say that planes can't be hacked yet hackers are still able to plug into a plane's entertainment system and start changing engine thrust and sending EICAS messages. There is no way to have a completely safe system…we all know how bad the military is at keeping their nukes safe. For god sakes the codes were set to all zeros throughout most of the cold war. I trust that given the schematics and enough time the chinese or the cabal for that matter could figure out an exploit.