Anonymous ID: 02b379 June 12, 2018, 6:30 p.m. No.1721962   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1721939

He's spending more time showing all the donations rolling in than anything else…. cares more about "transparency" than kids or rape trees or whatever..

Anonymous ID: 02b379 June 12, 2018, 6:41 p.m. No.1722112   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2136

1) Comms network is hacked to send authentic launch order to sub with orders to go comms dark and ignore further orders

2) Pentagon attempts to countermand missile launch but comms dark

3) Missile is launched and is detected on BMD radar in Alaska

4) Interceptors are launched either from Fort Greely or BMD-capable Destroyer off the coast

5) Missile is intercepted mid-course

Anonymous ID: 02b379 June 12, 2018, 6:50 p.m. No.1722248   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2309

>>1722200

We have pointed out numerous times that the author of that story is a paid military shill and is NOT to be trusted! Hence why he was one of the first to report on it.

Anonymous ID: 02b379 June 12, 2018, 6:56 p.m. No.1722337   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2348 >>2409

>>1722309

ADS is notoriously unreliable. To try to correlate ADS data to a streak in a photo is a ridiculous thing to base a story on which begs the question WHY did Tyler write the story… who cares? and keep in mind he wrote this well before it was mentioned by Q or was even in the new really.

Anonymous ID: 02b379 June 12, 2018, 7:09 p.m. No.1722487   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1722449

I think that even with a 20 second exposure the way a missile climbs it would still create the image we see. I think that the story by Tyler Rogoway showing up so quickly is suspicious. And I think Q pointing this out to us was no mistake as the most obvious answer is usually the correct one with Q