>>1722021

Maybe another clock fag can comment.

Clock reference from today was Q about 1:07 marker.

Minute hand on seven points to June 12 (today).

The 222 theory (or mirrored 111 day theory) also ended up hitting key dates regarding the missile posts.

That was the connection being discussed. Another Anon last bread was adamant about having kekked on 222 a while ago.

Needs more work to solidify connections.

>>1722361

Why would you say it aligning with today's date is being misinterpreted? It does. You are saying it is a coincidence and not relevant.

There are no coincidences.

Mirrored dates are relevant if you dig them.

11/02 aligning with 5:5 is worth a dig as well.