>>1721904 (my prev post for the evidence
>>1721702 (lb)
I gave you evidence. If you want to you can overlay the flight path and the map (both of which I provided and are called evidence)
Your second point is absurd. You are exhibiting resistance - you know very well that even if I could do that the conditions in the sky etc would never be exactly the same and you'd never be satisfied.
pic related is much more exciting I know.
remember, disinformation is necessary, esp when you combine it with the other meaning for 23 and Q's last post.
another anon posted it a couple of breads ago.
go look.
now that's interesting
I just made this argument and got called a shill (predictably, lol)
good luck to you!
it could be wrong of course, but it looks very likely.
I did a reverse image search this aft - that did not come up. Got the Chinese Hacking the navy article.