WHY WE DELETE SPAM: BECAUSE IT'S HARMFUL
Spam of any kind is not ok.
Spam based on race or religion is especially not ok, because goes against what's in Q's posts.
Even so, anons can still debate the issues.
Spam is different - it's constant repetition of same or similar material.
MKU technique to reach the subconscious.
Why deleted.
>>19737103
posted this article on the effects of repetition on peoples' beliefs.
turns out that even after only FIVE repetitions of an outrageous idea like "the Earth is square," people started believing it.
more on the effects of REPETITION i.e., SPAM
Truth-by-repetition: No matter how outrageous, repeated lies become the truth
It doesn't matter how ridiculous a lie is. As long as it is repeated often enough, some people will believe it.
Neuropsych — May 3, 2022
As early as the 1970s, studies have demonstrated that repeating a claim increases that claim’s truth value. In other words, the more often you hear a particular statement, the more likely you are to accept that statement as being true. In the scientific literature, this process is referred to as truth-by-repetition or TBR for short. ...
For a long time, researchers assumed that TBR only works on statements whose truth value is ambiguous or unknown to the test subjects. “Otherwise,” as one article published in 2009 puts it, “the statements’ truthfulness will be judged on the basis of their knowledge and not on the basis of fluency.” ....
However, recent studies suggest that the truth value of a statement need not be ambiguous for TBR to work its magic.
One study from 2015, for instance, found that TBR applied to statements that contradicted the participants’ prior knowledge, like, “The Atlantic Ocean is the largest ocean on Earth.” Another research paper, published in 2018, discovered a relationship between TBR and fake-news headlines shared on social media.
These studies suggest that TBR could work on any kind of claim, regardless of whether its truth value is ambiguous or not. However, they are not conclusive. While claims like, “The Atlantic Ocean is the largest ocean on Earth,” are false, many people lack the knowledge needed to recognize them as such. Similarly, the implausibility of fake news does not become obvious until you have been exposed to different sources, something fake news victims actively avoid.
If researchers really wanted to figure out if sheer repetition increases the validity of claims with unambiguous truth values, they are better off using statements that nearly everybody recognizes as false, such as, “The Earth is a perfect square.” This, incidentally, is exactly what a team of psychologists from Belgium’s UCLouvain set out to do in a recent study.
The authors of the study, which will appear in the June issue of the academic journal Cognition, asked participants to judge repeated statements as more true or less false compared to unrepeated ones, and they found that people “started giving credence to statements as highly implausible as ‘The Earth is a perfect square’ or ‘Benjamin Franklin lived 150 years’ after repeating them for just FIVE TIMES”
https:'//'bigthink.com/neuropsych/repetition-lie-truth-propaganda/