Anonymous ID: 2bf4e2 Aug. 8, 2022, 4:45 p.m. No.17251049   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1300

>>17227872

By golly, I can't remember the last time I responded to a shill. But for ol' times sake.

1st

>legally

what? just because they didn't ID with an SS number, that's what counts in your book?

2

up until 1987 because of Roe v Wade there was some unintended side effects.

For all of history it was assumed that babies could feel pain. Duh right? Well after roe v wade, to help the rolling make sense, all the sudden the entirety of the medical industry stopped using anesthesia on infants, and in many cases any child under the age of 2 yrs old.