>>1723368 lb

A puzzling crumb.

House sounds like House of Representatives.

House v. ARM sounds like a lawsuit.

Who/what is ARM?

v. can mean versus or version, typically.

Optics because, unfortunately, in a democracy the majority of voters don't have a clue and they buy the story that MSM tells them. The story has to be kept really, really simple.

>>1723405 already explained how DC works.

Why Ryan is still in office. I believe he now has to comply with whatever WH requires him to do.

Leaving because dirty, I suppose.

I guess WH controls Ryan (now). Formerly, deep state controlled him?

Are we engaged? You decide. Some evidence of logic being applied.

When does the Constitutional Crisis arrive?

Will it be that congress is unable to function due to lack of a quorum because so many members have been arrested, indicted, tried, forced to quit, killed, suicided, unable to walk down the street anymore? State governors can appoint replacements, but what if the state governors are in the same boat, hopelessly corrupt and unable to perform official duties for the same set of reasons?

Will it be when Obama is proven to have been ineligible for the presidency, rendering a significant part of his actions as President-usurper null and void? Treaties signed, legislation passed and signed into law, judges appointed, other federal appointees…

Will it be that we need the Supreme Court to adjudge some of these matters, but the Supreme Court is dysfunctional because so many justices were proven corrupt and impeached/removed?

Will it be something else?

Just wondering…

>>1723599

>>1723652

Doppler radar images are produced from data in a database.

Generally we assume the data is sensor data that got into the database by means of the radar.

There are other ways for data to get into a database, anons.

Electronic countermeasures can even inject false data into a data stream in transit, resulting in different 1's and 0's ending up in a database, giving the appearance of a radar anomaly.

That's one way it could happen.

Why do people always trust a database? Scratches head.

TechFag

>>1723746

There are 412 images in the

2018 Side-by-Side Proofs

folder in the Mega images database. Some are dups, quality is variable, but there are some good ones there.

Q RESEARCH GRAPHICS LIBRARY

https://mega.nz/#F!XtNhURSb!1Mdrvt-Y_onBw5VlFDRdCQ

21,500+ memes and infographs, keyword searchable, partially organized by topic

>>1723935

I doubt if the contents are identical.

I have not made any effort to reconcile what I collected with what others collected.

My collection is EVERYTHING in the nature of a side-by-side Q Proof that I harvested from the General breads. I have been harvesting since November 2017 but of course I missed some of the breads. When the breads started going really fast it was no longer possible to read every single bread.

What concerns me, what needs attention from anons, is the QUALITY of the proofs. Some of them were captured when we were not certain the proof was correct, and were subsequently improved or replaced. I never REMOVED anything that had been captured. If I judged a proof reasonably credible, I captured it.

I would feel much relief if anons with a different kind of autism than mine would actually REVIEW the QProofs with an eye to removing ones that are unhelpful, sorting the most excellent ones to the top of a stack, etc.

>>1724108

When you're trying to be a vacuum cleaner, you can't be really selective. What I captured obviously does reflect my opinion and my judgment as to what was credible. Being able to review the CONTENT of the proofs depends on (1) reading every Q crumb thoroughly and integrating that knowledge with other Q crumbs previously read, and (2) reading all of anons' comments about the crumbs until a consensus forms and a Proof is made.

It's impossible to do (1) and (2) thoroughly while vacuuming up and archiving image data at the same time. I tried, but could not meet my own standards that demand perfection in all things. Not nearly.

So that's the status of it.