The challenge is to make all those breads digestible. I got bloat just thinking about it.
It’s getting the taxonomy of the info organized and then presenting it in such away that it can be accessed and understood.
All within the constraints of the software.
And achieve a general consensus of what’s significant and what isn’t.
It needs top collaboration, and a minimum of fagbiting
I’m clockless. The case has not been articulated and I’m suspicious of theoretical models that don’t adequately explain past data - like models of anthropogenic climate change.
So: To clock, or not to clock?
It’s the information and explanations that are important. They serve to clarify events.
Everything else is a distraction.
Almost never. And I’d put all my craptocoin on it.
We’d be shadowbannsd in 15 minutes