>"No, a proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof, and when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven."
I could not resist.
>"No, a proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof, and when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven."
I could not resist.
Qanonpub is fantastic but a normie isn't going to wade through 1,500 posts to verify the authenticity of Q. Not to mention that a lot of the corresponding context re: current events would not be top of mind like it was when the posts were actually dropped.
NEED MOAR KITTEHS, STAT!!
Or RT reliable twatters… a little more subtle and less fear of doxxing.
I suggest @prayingmedic but there must be others.
Because MSM will continue to spread disinfo about events. If beloved HRC or BO or WJC or whoever go down, what will be the reaction amongst those who idolize them? And they will mention Q mockingly as they did before, to try and discredit. After all, THEY are the trusted source in news, right?
Same thing for coverage of SING summit too. It is easy for normies to believe their talking points because they basically confirm the conventional wisdom. Need strong proof to shake first timers awake.
"WARNING" may not be the best word choice…?