So I've remade the "Q's Authenticity" thread >>1552095 already linked at the top of each bread into a Q proof bread, and I'd like to see the best of the best proofs for things first off that Q has directly asked of us, namely:

>Side_by_Side (graphic form):

>BDT/False Flag posts vs actual news of bomb attempt (NYC)_

>DEFCON 1 posts vs H scare_

>[2] above represent PRIMARY indicators.

>SEC indicators = Posts:Tweets:Time

>REMAINDER below.

>START HERE.

>WILL GUIDE.

>Q

Then I might open the thread for more casual posting of proofs but lets give anyone new to this board our best shall we?

SO SHOW ME WHAT YOU GOT

>>1724370

Give me a graphic so concise it'll redpill your ex.

(So to speak)

>>1724712

I WISH

>>1724653

Which is what makes this a little difficult.

I really mean it, we need to narrow down these proofs to ones that hit you harder than a sack of bricks or redpilled someone you never thought redpillable.