Anonymous ID: cd7096 June 12, 2018, 9:13 p.m. No.1724554   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4593 >>4626 >>4666 >>4729

>>1724408

 

Well, I'm just thinking logically. Proof of Q after events does nothing to show normies what happened except that Q was legit. The only reasons I can think of that would drive people here for proof of Q is if Q went public.

 

On the other hand, if arrests are made, why would people need to even know about Q as the reasons for the arrests - the evidence presented - would be the information they need.

 

What as I missing?

Anonymous ID: cd7096 June 12, 2018, 9:18 p.m. No.1724677   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4697 >>4741

>>1724593

 

Even so, what benefit would it be to prove Q? The video would be self explanatory. Beyond that, tying Q to it would seem to tie GEOTUS which then opens up the criticism of it being a political hit job by Trump. Isn't that what we are trying to avoid here?